You must log in or register to comment.
Ever see something so cringe it wraps around to being funny again?
I know it’s trying to be alpha and macho as fuck so what happens when you have the fight and end up on the ark with the other bloke monkey?
Sex teim
If I saw this in my lawyer’s office, I’d take my papers anywhere else. I don’t mind personality in an office, but I’m not comfortable with the personality I’m getting from this
This is actually hilarious though
Yeah hilarious is good for comedians, not lawyers lmao
Sounds like a “lost my spot on the ark to two male monkeys” mindset. Never gonna fly in a court room smh
I would 100% not use this firm. Yikes. Terrible vibes from nearly every angle: legal, political, legal, ethical…
It’s okay, the first two monkeys are 🙈 blind and 🙉 deaf to evil. You can’t speak 🙊 anyway, just watch for creaky floorboards.
Partner put this up
cringe
at a law firm
bent double with the overwhelming pain of cringe
where we meet high net worth
Oh no, that makes perfect sense. All those people are freaks who would love this.
This cringe is painful. Luckily it’s the Internet and this is probably fake AF.
Ya, that doesn’t look like a conference room where anyone would entertain “high net worth clients”. Cramped, metal window frames, crappy furniture, cheap ceiling tiles. This looks like a room where someone would watch sexual harassment and forklift safety videos before they start working in a warehouse.
That image has been floating about without the explanatory text as well so I’m 100% the context is fake.
No. No this is about the cringe id expect.
I don’t think this is AI.
Also, the bible didn’t say only 2 monke
“Take with you seven pairs of all clean animals, the male and his mate, and a pair of the animals that are not clean, the male and his mate, and seven pairs of the birds of the heavens also, male and female, to keep their offspring alive on the face of all the earth” (Genesis 7:2–3)
Poster is both dumb and inaccurate.
Land animals (Leviticus 11:1–8; 26–30; Deuteronomy 14:6–8) that had completely split or “cleft” hooves and chewed the cud were considered clean and suitable for eating. Any land animals that did not meet this rule were unclean.
Sounds to me like monke would be unclean, so it checks out.
Depends on which book you’re reading. One says 2, one says 7, it’s all BS regardless.
“Poster is both dumb and inaccurate”
Just like the bible.
I’m not an expert, but I don’t think monkeys would have been considered clean in this context though. I’m pretty sure they’re not kosher.
Who knows. The person who wrote that probably didn’t know what a monkey was. I don’t think there are monkeys native to the region, so the only people who likely saw them were nobility and the tradesmen who worked for them.
Yeah there had to be a time afterwards where monkeys were first discovered and named.
Definitely not kosher
Let’s not eat monkeys, shall we?
Well of course not, they aren’t kosher
Was about to say something along the lines of this.
Put this on a shirt
This is what a lawyer who wants to rack up billables looks like.
Clearly this monke ain’t tryna fight cancer
