• dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Over a hundred thousand years the ocean of distrust has eroded the cliffs of trust in a non-insignificant manner.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Plenty of things, but the most obvious being the two separate instances they had issues with renewing their certs.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Could you please explain why not renewing their certs is such a serious betrayal? Like, if they fixed it, isn’t that okay? And even if it happened again, and they fixed it again, isn’t it human to err? Or why is it such a harsh offense?

        Serious question, I don’t know the consequences of not renewing these certs. 😊

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s the tls certificate that proves your website is legit. Without which, you can potentially be a malicious actor that can pose as the website, and when you download the iso, you could unknowingly download something malicious. It’s pretty hard to forget certificate renewal (most of the time there are plenty of reminders sent and warnings given), so the fact that it happened twice was very impressively bad.

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It’s pretty hard to forget certificate renewal (most of the time there are plenty of reminders sent and warnings given)

            Oh boy. Seems to be the opposite in real life. Especially when it comes to managing stored cert of businesses partners. It has gotten somewhat better now of course, but three years ago most of my company’s sev1 production issues were due to lapsing or unscheduled cert changes.

        • underisk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          it’s the main way for software to verify the identity of a source. without it you let nefarious actors do something like hijack a DNS server and impersonate your servers to your users, which is a pretty big problem if you’re running a software distribution network! it is literally a breach of trust and massive security vulnerability. and it probably broke a ton of shit when software that uses the certificate found an expired one and suddenly (and correctly) refused to work.