• ProfThadBach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The reason I got my ZFold5 was I like the fact that it could open up and give me a larger area to view and bigger keyboard. I have gotten the biggest phone I could get for the last 15 years or so because I have a hard time seeing the tiny screens. I would be happen to switch to a new OS but my old ass needs a bigger screen.

  • clif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    I recently picked up a 2024 model moto g power 5g. The main reason is that I needed the cheapest smart phone I could find locally to test a new provider (phreeli) before committing. That, and to serve as a ready backup if one of ours dies. $115 at a big box store.

    It’s… fine. Even after debloating I get about half the battery life of my galaxy s20 which is now 5 years old. I haven’t been able to figure out what’s eating it, or maybe it just has a smaller battery… I should check that.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My biggest concern is the life cycle of the device. I almost went with Motorola for my last phone, but saw that you were lucky to get 3 years of OS updates. Is that likely to be better on GrapheneOS? If so, that is a huge win imo. If not, it still isn’t ideal because I don’t want to have to buy a new phone every 2 years…

    • Hugging Stars@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      GrapheneOS was claiming 5-year support IIRC. Apple level support is infeasible. Not sure how affordable longer firmware support from Qualcomm is.

    • Luffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      Reading the original press release might be a good Start

      Their Thinkphones pretty much always had good update policy

      Almost like you cant really sell a 100€ device and expect it to be optimised like a mid range

    • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Why do you think they are $300-500? I don’t care about “only” 3 years of updates if i don’t have to spend $1300 on a friggin cellphone.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      but saw that you were lucky to get 3 years of OS updates.

      fucking great, less enshittification when they stop shoving the updates down your throat.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yea, except you aren’t getting security updates either… Basically anything connected to the internet should be getting security updates…

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Well, fuck. I really hoped they would pick FairPhone. Motorola is… Okay. I guess they made the Nexus 5 ; which was one of the best phones ever.

    I hope they make a SMALL one, I am so tired of this GIGANTIC pixel 9.

      • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s not the reason, the real reason is Fairphone doesn’t take security seriously. The GrapheneOS devs have called them out numerous times on that.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Motorola gets a little bit of love from me because they were (maybe still are?) the only ones who allowed me to shout “COMRADE MOTO!” to wake my phone up

      I will not say “Hey Google” in a million years. I refuse.

  • zingo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    All my phones have been Motorola, the first one was the Moto X - OG !

    Very well built and great batteries. Quality phones with close to stock UI for a snappy experience. Love the Moto Actions as well.

    Only negatives were updates and cameras. Both are much better these days.

    Especially now with an upcoming OS alternative!

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I’ll second this, me and the wife keep breaking or losing phones and have gone for cheap motorolas as replacements. Doesn’t have much bloatware, and can be easily purged.

      EDIT : If you hate the amount of bloatware, it does have, compare it to the samsung galaxy amounts of bloat.

    • bokherif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Moto X4 was an amazing phone, I hope they bring back smaller phones, I don’t want to use a tablet.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Me too. I’ve always bought Google Pixels but I don’t want to give Google my money anymore.

      So I’ll probably buy a Motorola if this deal gets through.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 hours ago

      My last few phones have been Motorolas and I’ve been very very happy with them.

      My only issue was that back then, I wasn’t really paying attention to alternative OSs like Graphene, Lineage or e/os and was therefore not really too concerned with ROM support/chip set. When I switched over to e/os, two of my Motorola’s (including the one I WANT to use with it) has no ROM support because it’s running a Mediatek chipset. So I’m using my second to last one while my nice new one collects dust.

      Moving forward I’ll be paying more attention to Qualcomm vs Mediatek.

      • Mwa@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        yeah i might focus on Android phones that have Good ROM/ support
        i think their graphene OS powered phone will have bootloader unlocking.

        i hope Google does not take away Sideloading. (but i think graphene returns it)

    • texture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      i bought a mororolla 3 years ago and it still lasts 2 days on a charge. id say go for it.

      • Mwa@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        i gotta see first if Motorola/Lenovo will actually ship graphene OS and other factors.
        they dont sound like bad phones and even better with this collab

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I actually bought a new Motorola phone 2 months ago precisely because i wanted a phone with an unlockable bootloader, and motorola delivered that.

    Vote with your wallet.

    • Guilvareux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Just wanted to echo the vote with your wallet sentiment. It’s the only power we have!

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I once bought a Motorola one phone because it would have quick and lengthy updates. Motorola certainly didn’t provide that.
      Other than that it was a decent phone.

  • Luminous5481 [they/them]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is great news. While I still think we should make a push towards Linux phones being mainstream so that we don’t keep this duopoly on OSes, it’s nice to know that at least one manufacturer is currently defying googles obvious goal of suppressing third party ROMs and marketplaces.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Thanks for the reality check. While this a good development, I share your concern and we should not stop,or even slow, developing any fully free as in freedom OS. I tried PostmarketOS on an old Oneplus 6T recently and I estimate we have one or two more phone replacement cycles until I think it’ll be ready for me to switch.

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oki. I’ll wait then. Was gonna get OnePlus 15 but but features is so meh - just pushing ai and I’m not interested

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I had completely forgotten Lenovo bought Motorola from Google some 10 years ago. Honestly haven’t seen a Motorola phone in at least that long …

      • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Been using motorola for a long time. I bought Moto Z in 2016 and it booted with “Motorola company” text in the end of the boot video. After Lenovo acquisition, phone updated and video now said “Motorola, a Lenovo company”.

        Thankfully, Motorola haven’t entshittified over these years. Still a solid phone. Almost no bloat.

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    a future smartphone to have GrapheneOS pre-installed

    I’ll not trust Lenovo (Motorola is Lenovo) preinstalling stuff on my phone. They’ve already ship Windows laptop with literally malware and backdoors (even in UEFI, so persistent across format) preinstalled.

    I will rather install it myself.

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Fully agree on that. Always better to start fully fresh, even without such problems.

      That said, it’s still important that it will ship pre-installed. That way app-developers who block GrapheneOS cannot excuse their actions anymore by saying that it was your decision to use another OS, and therefore not their problem.

    • Kuma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If it wasn’t because of this

      As it stands today, GrapheneOS is exclusively available on Google Pixel devices. Whatever device Motorola is building with GrapheneOS, it’s beyond even the Motorola Signature’s specs, which is currently the “flagship” in Motorola’s lineup, as even that doesn’t meet the needed requirements.

      I thought first maybe one year, but that statement made me very sceptical if that is possible.

    • GarboDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      When the phone comes out lol /joking

      Fr tho i think they reveal new phones every April? So if not April this year then April of next year.

  • wavebeam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I tried to switch from iPhone to Pixel 10 Pro Fold with GrapheneOS, but I needed RCS to work. Unfortunately, even installing Google Messages and allowing it permissions wouldn’t allow RCS to work for more than 36 hours before I had to go through the whole install and allow process again. I would be willing to cut off all Google services, even banking apps and whatnot, but I need RCS to work. I’m unfortunately an American and cannot reliably expect my friends and family to use an app other than iMessage to text, so I need RCS.

    Will Motorola provide some GrapheneOS compatible RCS client? If so, I am likely to switch.

      • wavebeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, see that’s the thing that I think people don’t really understand about americans. They won’t. I will be essentially excommunicated. I already mostly am because I don’t use Facebook or Instagram. Cutting off decent messaging by leaving imessage without at least maintaining RCS would really cut me off.

        • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          American here, I’ve been insisting on signal for years and it’s going fine. If you’re cool enough people will follow your lead eventually, it’s a better experience and everyone else waiting to switch is being held back by the same excuse. Take your good posts and go home (to open platforms)

            • nile_istic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Lmao, but I’ve found it’s less about being cool and more about being firm. I’ve got three friends that I told very plainly “I will no longer be reachable via SMS, please use Signal”. Bear in mind that 1) these are people who love me a lot, more like family than friends, and 2) I didn’t try to shame them or demand they stop using SMS entirely. I just said “this is how you reach me now”. All three installed Signal, and one of them now uses it as their primary method of text communication like I do.

              Not saying it’s easy necessarily, and I doubt this method would work for acquaintances rather than family or close friends. But every little helps, and it’s a place to start.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This right here, I have never had any luck moving a single person I currently communicate with from iMessage. Dating makes this even more complicated.