Why??
Because child processing and sacrificing child are very epstein thing to do…
It even has a redaction!
That’s hilarious. I’m guessing its a result of an auto-redacter which is set to redacts urls or something? since the original would be
--enable-largefile Enable support for large files (http://www.sas.com/standards/large_ file/x_open.20Mar96.html) if the operating system requires special compiler options to build programs which can access large files. This is enabled by default, if the operating system provides large file support.
Something about child processes, maybe?
I hate this, here have an up vote
That is probably the actual answer though lol
Because legal discovery data retrieval is almost entirely automated. You are always going to end up with some irrelevant shit in there because it matched a keyword search somebody used for discovery.
Source: I used to do this when companies I worked for got subpoenas for email data.
Yup probably because “children” and/or “child” is referenced in there
Why isn’t there one in your files?
He had it on a hard drive or someone emailed it to him.
did RMS visit epstein island?
EDIT : hey, when you have a billion, you might as well get a thinkpad and try out this “lin-ux” thing
