I was pretty hyped for the new prince of persia game (the lost crown), but come to find out it’s only available on ubisoft’s proprietary launcher or epic games. Nope, and nope.

I just want to have it available on my usual storefront, Steam, but it’s been decidedly omitted. As a long time fan of the old games, this kind of hurts. Especially since many of the others -are- available on Steam.

I wonder if/when it will come out for Steam. These platform exclusivity deals need to die.

Edit: It’s also available on several consoles, my post was just from a pc gamer’s perspective.

  • Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Cue the BUT STEAMS MONOPOLY idiots that completely ignore that Valve does nothing to stop anyone from competing with them, its just that anyone who has tried (outside GOG) has only produced anti consumer garbage

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Steams DRM is a VERY REASONABLE compromise between the interests of the devs and the consumer not wanting to be unfairly punished/annoyed. Steams DRM has literally NEVER caused me a headache aside from ONCE when steam was super new, its a non issue at this point

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, and when I show up to work, regardless of how much I like what I do or my coworkers, I expect to be paid for it, your point is? They created a form of DRM that is the least obtrusive out there, made it optional, and they gave us one of the best store fronts out there as compensation for it. Again, Ubi, EA, and Epic’s DRM is FAR WORSE.

  • ombremad@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Me in 2004: Yeah I’ll never play Half-Life 2 because I hate that it comes with a mandatory useless piece of software. « Steam », what the hell is that? Full of DRMs, ugly, bugged to the core, eating up my precious RAM.

  • BillDaCatt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    You can be sure that even the Epic version will still require the Ubisoft launcher. That is how all of my Steam purchased Ubisoft games are with the exception of the first Assassin’s Creed which predated the Ubisoft launcher. All of the others require it regardless of how I bought it.

    I’m going to wait for at least two or more years after release for the new Prince of Persia. My days of paying full price for Ubisoft’s games are over and recent statements from the CEO make me reluctant to ever buy their games again.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        On their own game engine.

        Built to showcase their specific VR hardware. That they built after getting burned from multiple VR companies who abused Valves good will of providing access to their patent protected VR tech for free, to help accelerate the VR industry.

      • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        …a platform that works much better than the others… and a game that has been made with more love than anything in the past half a decade

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        You are fully justified to put your own developed stuff where youwant to.
        On this one point I side with Ubisoft.

  • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ubisoft is shit, most of their games are.

    The moment I heard the new Prince of Persia had Denuvo, I wasn’t going to play it anyway.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If it’s denuvoed you’ll have to wait for the crazy bigot Empress to crack it. Could be a while.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          If it’s denuvoed you’ll have to wait for the crazy bigot Empress to crack it. Could be a while.

          30 seconds of googling revealed that someone already packaged the Switch version for PC with a preconfigured emulator.

        • shani66@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m still kinda shocked there isn’t anyone else trying. Maybe you need to be crazy to be a legend.

            • shani66@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              It is, but i don’t think for a second empress is the only person to stumble across the solution. Unless it’s something so crazy only a crazy could do it.

              I know there are a lot of reasons why it’s a harder choice to make; you can’t share the secret because that’s a security risk, you can’t make as much money, you are at greater risk. I guess i just miss the old days where people into tech were anti establishment and into doing things because it was cool.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been boycotting Ubisoft for years, haven’t missed a damn thing.

      Yeah, there are so many great games by non-shitty developers. Skipping Ubisoft, EA, and Activision entirely is not only possible but there are more great games left than one can play anyway.

  • MaximilianKohler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s definitely convenient to have everything in once place, and Steam has way more features, but it’s good to avoid Steam becoming too monopolistic. We saw recently how badly that can go with reddit.

    Despite the widespread worshipping of Steam and GabeN, I’ve had lots of issues with Steam and Valve over the years.

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Convince other companies to be not shit competition then. Steam has its near monopoly because its competition is dogshit

      • ombremad@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, Steam gained its near monopoly through anti-consumer practices as well: being mandatory for playing Valve games, even offline, as soon as 2004; being DRM-ridden; locking consumers out of their right to sell their games on second-hand market; still enforcing an old revenue share system that’s hurting devs; or putting micro-transactions everywhere with their collectible system that you can’t really disable at all. Just to name a few.

        Steam is not better than others. You’re just used to its flaws.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yeah, Steam has DRM. Its the least annoying DRM that exists entirely because they gave us one of the best shop fronts that exists on PC as a trade off. And all companies have the right to sell their own games on whichever store they wish. Unlike Epic, Steam doesnt buy the exclusive rights to OTHER companies games, its just their own games. Your imaginary competition utopian dreamland doesnt exist, and you’re turning optional mole hills into mountains in order to pretend the best option we have is bad. If you don’t like collectible trading cards and the least annoying DRM ever created, go buy on GOG, EPIC UBI and EA all have FAR WORSE practices

  • BargsimBoyz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lol as someone else put it, it’s silly to complain that you won’t buy a game because it doesn’t use the marketplace you want to use.

    Steam is just one marketplace and it needs competition. One day it’s going to go through enshittification and when that happens you’ll be thankful other marketplaces exist.

    Sometimes I honestly wonder why PC gamers get so riled up over inconsequential things.

      • BargsimBoyz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve never found it more convenient to use Steam or another store over piracy so it doesn’t make much difference to many.

        Some of the games I do own on Steam now don’t work either, so it’s not like it’s an amazing store.

        But if it’s inconvenient to download a different client just to buy a game then you’re just lazy. It’s not like you have to subscribe to it, it’s just a click and 5 minute wait.

        • Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Lazy for not wanting to have 6 different accounts and launchers? Nah. It’s easier to just get a pirated version than trying to remember which service you bought what on.

          • BargsimBoyz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            If it’s hard work having 6 launchers, it’s easier to just get a pirated version period, so might as well just pirate everything.

    • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not even close… no one is complaining that it’s on other stores, the problem is that it isn’t on steam and even if there was, it still requires you to install their own garbage client. Quite literally the opposite.

      • BargsimBoyz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Who cares if it is on Steam or not though?

        If everything was on everything then sure, that would be great. But that’s not realistic, and having this alternative where everything is on Steam but not elsewhere is not a good solution for that because Steam will be shit one day, and already has quite a few shitty issues.

        Honestly, people have this ridiculous view of PC gaming and Steam sometimes. Look around the world and show me where having one company having a massive hold over that sector has ever worked out well long term for consumers.

        • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Man what are you on and whats with these pointless anti steam propaganda. I get why people would be against steam but this literally isn’t one of them.

          So let me repeat that. NO ONE WANTS IT TO BE STEAM EXCLUSIVE. PEOPLE ARE AGAINST PLATFORM EXCLUSIVITY. To me you look like weird one having some weird fetish for hating big bad companies. Everyone knows the problems of monopoly and I have also taken course on economics so I am somewhat aware of it but I buy things where it’s convenient and if it isn’t I would rather pirate it. Doesn’t matter if it’s stream or gog or epic, you are simply barking at the wrong tree mate.