It’s just
y = k*x + ma few trillion times.You’re forgetting the activation function to break linearity, otherwise you can only model linear trends. Many activation functions have “if” hidden in them (e.g. ReLU with the “max”).
Yes it’s not even for loop and if. Just multiplication and addition.
More accurately:
>looks inside
>matrix multiplicationMatrix multiplication, activation functions and softmax. Also some matrix addition sometimes. That’s literally it
Everything is quantum field fluctuations.
That’s literally it.
Yes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
A transistor is on or off. It’s all if-then.
No, it’s more elemental: it’s all ands , ors and nots
Boolean math let’s you convert it all to nand gates. For ease of manufacturing this is what is done.
98% accurate prime checker, super fast
isPrime() return False;
Had one guy asking if AI is conscious. I said the whole thing is actually one very big excel sheet, so does he think that excel can be conscious? Anyway, I think the guy is now in a relationship with office.
Max(input*weights, 0) is an if in a sense, I guess.
Good old ReLU. I’ve heard that CNN’s perform better when using ReLU as the activation func, and that’s probably why; ReLU acts as a filter on the image’s features.
Nah. Without a nonlinearity you just get a linear combination of inputs instead of the output of a deep neural network. ReLU or Ramp is just the simplest possible non linearity. Using a simple function can enable using deeper networks yielding even better performance.
It’s actually somewhat of a headache, numerically. Works well enough tho.
come on, it’s not that simple!
there’s also linear algebra
The human brain is far too complex to understand
looks inside
it’s just meat
The brain isn’t meat, it’s fat, and is known to turn to soap under the right conditions. Which coincidentally also explains the soapy tiddy memes.
🤚sapient
🫰saponified
The brain can turn into soap? Did it still work after? Can soap think?
Singing meat!?
You don’t have to be an AI developer to not understand your code. I not understand my code every day.
-Agent
Have you ever tried to follow five hundred nested for loop and if statements? Shit is nuts…
Conway’s Game of Life is Turing Complete and that fact has been fucking with my mind for like 25 years.
Oh, just wait till you hit that sweet sweet python “Everything can have an
elseblock”if some_shit: try: for stuff in thing: if stuff is bad: raise ShitHitTheFanError # Massive block comment do = the_thing() if do is good: break else: do = the_other_thing() if not a_thing: help_me() # May raise NoHelpFoundError except ShitHitTheFanError: my_life = recover() if my_life is bad: for fuck in my_life: try: fix(fuck) except NoHelpFoundError: break else: fuck_this_shit() else: wat_is_going_on() else: theres_another_one("?")I’m a network engineer lol python is all I know… and yup, the else is a curve ball from hell
But this is absolutely fucking hilarious
If statements are some of the largest sources of bugs in software.
I mean, without if statements and loops theres no logic? It would only be flat code, so i mean… Yeah?
If this is true then everything is fine.
Edit: Damn, I’m part of the problem, right?
That was old AI.
New AI uses a complex, multi-layer sequence of Magic 8-balls.
That’s a common misconception. It is a complex multi-layer sequence of heavily biased Magic 8-balls.
With a post-it note saying “be polite, don’t hallucinate”
I wouldn’t be surprised if some stuff (as in architecture) was solved by querying a different model to solve a problem
“Mirror mirror on the wall please fix my awful code, make no mistakes”
ml is not a hard coded set of if-else pairs. it’s a glorified fit with a lot of parameters.
