Idiocracy, here we come.

    • NathanUp@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes, as a means of measuring intelligence. What it was designed to do, and what it is used for in a clinical context, is to measure for impairment against your peers.

    • Pratai@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      So…. You didn’t read the article, and it shows. Maybe it is on to something.

        • Lexam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, well I think this thread has a very angry vibe and needs a picture of a cat!

      • wagesj45@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Did… you read the comment? They made a simple statement. They didn’t go beyond that and made no other claims. You’re the one assuming, here.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        No that doesn’t make IQ a good measurement of intelligence. Volumes have been written on this and how it is more a measurement of one’s heritable environment. Source: I am a millennial with an above average IQ.

        • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          So… when used at a population level rather than at an individual level, and used for comparison between generations from the same place… they’re a good metric?

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Good in what sense? Consider that people do better on an IQ test if you offer to pay them more based on their performance. One might conclude that Gen Z values the IQ test than prior generations, or it could be reflective of the environment having more food swamps.

        • Pratai@piefed.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          And again…. They tested for more than just IQ. Read the article. Try and understand it.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Maybe instead of insulting others try to understand what is being said here. Both things can be true: that IQ is not a good index to use in this context and that other measurements have shown cognitive decline.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The article does mention IQs being lower, though. It’s just not the only measure mentioned. I’m curious how the others were measured