great american humorist. non-aesthetic socialist libtard. proud appalachian-american.

  • 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2024

help-circle
  • Subd. 3. Exemption. The prohibitions in subdivision 2 do not apply when the website, application, software, program, or other service requires the technical skill of a user to nudify an image or video.

    I get the idea, but this doesn’t comfort me, because what is “technical skill” here? That seems subjective and will ultimately be up to a court to decide. What constitutes a skill? It’s prompting a skill? Is prompting Photoshop’s AI a skill? Their lasso tool is pretty easy to use. The line isn’t clear, and a clever lawyer, or a judge, or a jury could come down differently on what counts and what doesn’t.

    I get the goal here. But I think we were already covered by the existing law that made distribution of these artificial nudes illegal.








    • 4 Dell T 7810s
    • 4 hard drive cages (14 drives)
    • Amcrest NVR
    • TV Antenna
    • 2 Ubiquiti WiFi APs
    • Buttload of switches around the house
    • Protectli Vault mini-pc running pfsense for my router
    • ProxMox cluster with about 30 virtual machines running everything

    I love the Dells I use. They’re wonderful little workhorses, and I got a pretty good deal as they used to mine chia cryptocurrency.






  • Sounds like you’re asking the human brain to fire in a pattern it’s not even wired for. Random noise in the web, or even definitionally impossible as “totally alien” might imply a configuration of neurons opposite of what we have. I feel like I’m having a hard time describing my thought here.