• shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    i love cables, cables are the best thing, give me snakey boy, give me wired headphones, give me wired keyboard and mice

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wireless data links should be the exclusive domain of temporary, nomadic and/or sacrificial links.

    If the channel is permanent, static, or critical; as much of the path as practicable should be provisioned with constrained energy transmission.

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The router is useless-ish without the $3 snakey boi.

    “Ish?” Because you could set it up as a Wireless repeater?

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can get routers which use a SIM card for getting internet access. They’re pretty cool. You just plug them into a wall outlet and bam, you’ve got your WiFi with internet access.

      Plus you can even get them with integrated powerbank, so you really don’t need to plug anything anymore.

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes, some wireless routers can be used as repeaters.

      Routers like that are really multi-purposes devices that handle routing, switching, and wireless. If you’re only using a local network, you can still have the wifi network and all your devices communicate through that. You just won’t have internet access.

      With out the router/switch, the cable’s usefullness is reduced - at least in the networking application we’re talking about (the cable itself is incredibly usesful for many other things besides ethernet). You can connect (most) devices directly together for communication, they’ll just self assign an IP address.

      In less words, you can have a network with just a wireless router and no cable, but you can’t have a network with only a cable and no router (well, you can’t with ‘normal people’ devices)(also you don’t need a router for a local network, only a switch - but the home versions are often combo devices and just called a router).

    • idk (she/her)@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      i got 10m of cat 6 for 28pln(around $8) at my local store, and to overpower the router on the picture you probably only need cat 5e

    • kaotic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s a few 10 packs of 6 foot cables on Amazon for around $18, that’s less than $2 each.

      • TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The leftovers from a 100’ roll i bought 15 years ago, some dusty ends and a crimper. $3 is probably too much. It’s probably been 15 years since I’ve done it too but I still remember the order: Orange-white, orange, green-white, blue, blue-white, green, brown-white, brown

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      for a short prefab patch cable to go from modem to router, it’s actually a bit higher than what we pay.

  • OozingPositron@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why the fuck do they join the cables that need to go separated into the connector? Setting these up is a pain in the ass.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve grown to hate these routers. They only seem useful if you live in an apartment and place them in the middle and your walls are made of paper. Bought a few through the years thinking more money = better wifi, but wall construction and placement have much more impact. Living in a brick house, they’re pretty shit. I’ve switched to non gamified wifi AP’s connected to ethernet and the wifi’s been great. Still prioritize wired wherever possible though.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      One of the worst things about those routers other than having generally poor coverage despite looking like a Crown of Thorns was that if you actually took advantage of the more advanced features like VLANs, port forwarding, static routes, FTP and all that stuff and set it up… It inevitably seemed that there was a 99% chance that a firmware update would not allow you to restore a backup of the router config on the updated device!

      That happened a couple times, spent days getting everything set up only to find out the firmware update refused to load a config made with an older version. F that. Never used those routers again.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Used to live in a 2 story house built in the 1900’s. It had plaster & lath walls. I ended up with 4 AP’s scattered about before we had decent WiFi coverage.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      If something looks cool and flashy and has tons of “extra functions” I stay the fuck away from it because I know the target demographic and I know it’s going to be shit in surprising ways.

  • raven55six@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    None of them are as cheap as mentioned in the post. But the snakey boi wins easy. The spiky boi is good if you wanna connect multiple devices and WiFi based file sharing in ecosystem setups. But the snakey boi has no dropping WiFi packets issues because it is simply internet plugged into your computer. Plus, WiFi travels through your walls the way it wants. Snakey boi travels through your walls the way you drill the holes to pass the cable. So, snakey boi wins always!

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Still a computer. And quite integral one. If it doesn’t work, your internet and all devices that connects to it won’t work. This is a device that has to work 24/7 and produce 0 issues at any time ad long ad it works. Higher end ones also have quite a bunch of useful settings and customization options. A normie might not need them, but a power user would appreciate these settings and how reliable this router is.

      But for 750 that is overkill.

      • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nah here in Europe its the same shit. A 100-120€ router a few years ago might cost 200€ today. Top tiers are also doubled in price.

      • Zanathos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Compounded that 2.5gb is the norm now with wifi7. Consumer routers with 2.5 were inflated to being with last I checked and I have no idea what they cost now.

    • Feidry@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      They are computers, more or less. Very specific and controlled computers, with only exactly what they need to do their job. Mostly anyways.

  • Doom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wifi? You may as well believe in magic. Buy a box of cable and one of these!

    No testers - raw dog it. Party like a Quake party in 1999.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Had one. Somebody stole it at a lan, many years ago. Haven’t bought another one, since, because I’m dumb.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I bought a cheap tool years ago and a few hundred feet of cat6 and some connectors and wall plates

      ran my main AP off my own crimped cords for years without issue. speed tests always showed full speed

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      And now I will sing a traditional song of my people.

      🟧⬜,🟧,🟩⬜,🟦,🟦⬜,🟩,🟫⬜,🟫.

        • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          OK so I just learned, like, last week that there are two standards. Why are there two standards? WTF?

          (The context is I was turning an Ethernet cable into an EtherCAT cable, which is a stupid industrial standard where you only wire up pins 1, 2, 3, and 6, and then charge the end user 200 times more for the cable.)

          • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            There are two standards as it allows one to make a crossover cable. (Do B on one side and A on the other)

            I also find crossover cables completely useless and refuse to own one less it gets mixed into the pile. Everyone has a router/switch, which negates the need completely.

            • black0ut@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Back at the beginning of times ethernet, you needed the crossover cables to connect routers to routers, switches to switches or end devices to end devices. They wouldn’t work with the straight cables.

              The standard still needs those cables to be crossover, but nowadays the port itself can detect what type of cable you connected, what type of cable it needs, and rewire itself to accept whatever you throw at it.

              The same thing happens when you directly connect 2 PCs together without a switch in the middle. But the ports also adapt themselves and work it out.

              You could also use a crossover cable, and your devices would figure it out too.

        • zackhow@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Crossover, but it isn’t needed anymore since most modern devices can detect what they are connected to and adjust.

          • Feidry@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Well there was A and B and it’s been long enough since I made any cable, I don’t remember which one everyone uses and which one only weirdos use.

            • netweirdo@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              T568B is the one everyone uses while T568A is the odd one.

              I don’t get what’s particularly bad about T568A though? I was told it’s just plain worse than T568B for anything faster than gigabit and I swear I never saw any store bought cables using it.

              • Zanathos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                The configuration has absolutely no bearing on performance. It is purely for standardization. Straight through cables work with either because it’s literally just connecting the copper on either end. The difference between A and B is just flipping 2 pairs around although I forget which. Only 4 or 5 cables of 8 are even used to this day which is crazy.

                • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  There are 4 pairs of 2 wires, for 8 overall. They are all used, but the pairs are redundant. From what I understand, when you send a positive pulse on, say, the solid blue wire, you also send a negative pulse on the stripy blue and white wire. The twisted pairs should counteract any interference, but if it doesn’t, the arrival of the bumps with opposite polarity should foolproof things a little.

                  Oh yeah it’s called differential signalling.

  • myyass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s still nice to have a competent router though. Why not both? Also shield your cables!