Fire in the hole!

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Star Trek is also a post scarcity society and they aren’t using water to run the models. IP ownership in the Federation is still a thing though, so long as the genAI isn’t using copyrighted material, it’s fine.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If I could have generative AI make me a paradise world that I could escape to whenever I’m not making money to pay for the paradise world, I wouldn’t give AF. Also, Star Trek has Fusion and Matter/Anti-matter power generation that’s nearly entirely clean.

    Unfortunately, the best our AI can do is make people with 6 fingers and write bad code while using all the water and electricity.

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Meh I thought the holodeck was mostly a writer’s crutch and an excuse to loot the Paramount lot for period costumes.

  • BigGovernment@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The simplest answer, real world LLMs and AI are real, and holodecks are fictional. Plenty of things are cool in fiction and not something we should actually build.

    See the classic tweet about the Torment Nexus.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      LLMs and AI are real

      I would say that the “AI” we currently have aren’t really AI as most people imagine or how they are thought depicted in science fiction.

      Intellect usually requires a capacity to think, understand, and at least mimic the way the mind learns. The current machine learning we currently call AI is more a kin to the classic Chinese Room thought experiment.

    • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Is there? It’s a machine, which learns and autonomously makes decisions based on that learning. It generates a scene.

      I dunno, sounds like genAI to me, albeit a handful of generations down the line

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The difference is that Starfleet has the ethical standards in place to make that technology non disruptive to their society. We wouldn’t survive being gifted ships that can glass the planet, for example. Wed fuck that up immediately.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Star Trek’s universe: Federation citizens live in essentially zero scarcity where labor is optional and people can dedicate their lives to basically anything they like that this within their capabilities.

    Star Trek’s AI: A typically flawless tool (when the plot doesn’t require an incident), optionally used by the individual, to perform complex calculations, simulations or provide immersion entertainment, complimenting whatever task needs done.

    Our universe: We live in a capitalist society where the survival of 95% of the population requires them to sell their labor, where the majority of the population works in any job(s) they can get to make ends meet, where working in a creative or intellectually fulfilling field is a rare blessing and prohibitive to most, where your capitalist overlords claim the majority of your productivity for themselves and see the wages they do pay you as a burden to them that should be minimized regardless of your well-being.

    Our AI: Devalues or replaces creative and intellectual roles. Forced down the throats of workers and consumers. Used to collectively monitor everyone. Used to push more wealth to a concentrated few. Notably and constantly unreliable while given unearned trust. Not actually intelligent, just good at specific kinds of prediction and parroting based on training from real works from real people that was stolen without the consent of the creators to be fed into the machines to be plagiarized on request. A genuine risk to the stability of our economy. A nightmare for the mental health of children and those vulnerable to delusions and/or thoughts of self-harm. Increasingly used to replace thought and skill development making us collectively dumber and more reliant on it.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Make an opponent capable of defeating Data”

    ST AI: Have a supercharged Moriarty.

    RL AI: deletes production database

  • Labna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Wrong, the holodeck follow instructions, the AI neural simulation don’t.

    Unless you like to play in simulation created by a simulation, coded with an abstract language, run into a virtual machine.
    At some point in time, humanity will learn.

  • Murse@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Artificial intelligence in science fiction is intelligence that’s artificial.

    Artificial intelligence in real life is more akin to what we’d call “artificial flavors” in some fruit drink that contains 0% fruit. Isn’t fruit, doesn’t taste like fruit, but it’s purple and sweet, so fuck it: “grape”. We’ve accomplished the “artificial” part, but not the bit that actually matters.

    So, yeah, AI in sci-fi is unironically great. “AI” irl is shit. If the real version ever comes close to the sci-fi version, you’ll see a lot of the haters change our tune, but until then we’ll call a turd a turd.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      OK, but how will we ever get to “great” AI if we don’t invest in less great AI to drive research. If the luddites on Lemmy calls the shots, Data will never see the light of day.

      • Murse@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Well, rolling with the artificial flavors analogy, we can start by stopping the infuriating trend of adding artificial grape flavor to every fucking food item under the sun. No one asked for or wanted that shit, but now it’s become a chore to find so much as a bag of coffee beans that doesn’t have some blip on the packaging advertising “Now with grape!!” Not only does it taste bad, but it’s caused the cost of food to fucking double.

        Second, we can start being honest about what it actually is. Again, it doesn’t taste like grape, so why the fuck are we calling it grape? With AI this is as much on us as it is with the companies marketing that garbage - for ages we’ve been calling so much as an NPC’s pathing algorithm in a videogame “AI” even though there’s objectively no intelligence at play. We’ve since tried to move the goal posts a bit by relabeling actual AI as “AGI” but I guarantee that’ll just become another term to muddy the waters with marketing bullshit. The shit we’re calling “AI” is just categorically not even on the same path as the the kind of AI we see in sci-fi. So if you want Data to see the light of day, we’ll need to stop wasting our time and money on what is effectively a spell checker that’s wrong occasionally.

        Unless you think Data is just a chat bot with no consciousness, in which case, hooray, we’ve done it: AI. 🎉 …now can I please have a mug of coffee without Grape™ syrup in it? I know, such a Luddite, drinking coffee without grape! Guilty as charged. But adding that shit to my coffee is never going to get us a product that tastes and feels etc like a grape, so if that’s what you’re after, maybe keep it in R&D and off the fucking grocery shelves.

      • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        “research” doesn’t need billions of dollars in commercial data centres. The shitty “ai” we have is all about line must go up.

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yes but not all generative AI is LLMs. I hate wine, but saying “you know beer is alcohol too” is not something that should make me feel hypocritical about liking beer. It’s not alcohol I hate, it’s wine.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Now this might have something to do with what they mean when they disable safeguards. Maybe there’s a layer of user-defined limits that are carefully defined and that’s part of the craft of a good holodeck program, but when safeguards are disabled, it just runs as a raw universe simulation, matter, photons and all.