• nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      A lot of the suggestions there are confusing and/or unhelpful

      Like

      hallucination → undesirable output

      We all know what AI hallucinations are, calling it “undesired output” just removes all the specificity and makes communication more difficult.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Actually I remember back when people start to calling it hallucinations there was quite a bit of pushback on it because it’s a complete mischaracterization of what’s going on.

        If you are performing a task and you make a mistake, that wasn’t hallucination, it was a mistake.

        When AI is hallucinate it’s not because they “think” the hallucination is real, it’s just that their weird math brain spewed out the wrong answer, for whatever reason, and now they are stuck with it and need to try and make some kind of coherent sentence out of it.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Agreed. However, the concept of decreasing this anthropomorphization as much a spossiblr is really helpful. All these crappy articles about AI acting like some sort of nefarious human misdirects the real concerns and is just media fodder for click bait news outlets (which is pretty much all news outlets now). I genuinely think it’s a more news is good news for the AI companies.