• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    we can’t even get self driving cars right yet, I’m not sure ATC is going to be any better. 99% reliability will probably be easy, it’s that last 1% that could take decades to fix.

    • wagesj45@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s one of those things that can absolutely be done with care, effort, and money. But we lack a government that will put any of those toward the project. And the private sector will actively undermine it to scrape a few more pennies off the top.

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      We’ve had self flying and landing planes for years though. You can’t really compare controlled airspace to the chaos that is operating on the ground.

      I’m still skeptical they won’t fuck it up, but this should be a manageable problem for ai.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yet pilots still fly and land manually. And if those systems work so well why haven’t we had self-controlling air traffic for years too?

      • fake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        We’ve had self flying and landing planes for years though

        Because none of it relies on any kind of AI. It doesn’t have to make decisions, it just flies programmatically. If you commanded it to fly into the ground it would (has, Germanwings crash). Autopilot wont even respond to a collision avoidance resolution advisory.

      • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s different than AI tho

        That’s an example of a computer being utilized in the way ut should be (with predictable outcomes

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          People don’t realize that LLMs are not computers.

          LLMs are software that turns a computer (an incredibly powerful tool of reliability and precision) into an imitation of a room temperature IQ person who thinks they’re an infallible genius because they can search google.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Determinism is one of the greatest properties of a computer and should be the gold standard of any program. Guess what LLMs fundamentally can’t do?