Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoStand your groundslrpnk.netimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1933arrow-down17
arrow-up1926arrow-down1imageStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoLotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoLotRers. Fans of Lord of the Rings.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoYes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
Lotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
It says, in fact, LOπERS.
LOPIERS
WILL BE SH∞T ON SIGHT
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
deleted by creator
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.