Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoStand your groundslrpnk.netimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1933arrow-down17
arrow-up1926arrow-down1imageStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoYes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoLotRers. Fans of Lord of the Rings.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
deleted by creator
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.