- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The detailed sourcing directly attacks Sony’s legal claim that a reasonable person wouldn’t expect to own their digital purchases on the PlayStation Store.
The detailed sourcing directly attacks Sony’s legal claim that a reasonable person wouldn’t expect to own their digital purchases on the PlayStation Store.
Here’s the actual wiki
Oh shit, its rossman’s consumer rights wiki! Cool to see ☺️
If they meet in any reasonable court, Sony is fucked.
Capitalism
Would be the same under any system. The admin is corrupt
“Sigh, ok, you win… AGAIN… How much is that? 0.5% of our quarterly profit? Sure, man, whatever. Here. Buy yourself something nice.”
They’ll settle
“How much is that? Oh ok, that’s what I tip my limo driver. Here you go.”
I should drive a limo
Well, any person who has made a PSN account in the past 15 years is bound by arbitration. An arbiter that Sony pays. An arbiter that will not get paid again if they rule against Sony.
So… probably not reasonable.
Glad I never made a PSN account. Glad I stayed the fuck away from Helldivers 2 until they removed the stupid PSN requirement.
Forced arbitration provisions have been thrown out before. So have contract clauses that ban class actions.
A company can put whatever they want in their agreements, whether it is enforceable is a completely different story, and things are tossed out by courts all the time.
So Sony isn’t fucked then.
Too big to fail.