🇨🇦

  • 14 Posts
  • 722 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • Flock effectively follows you around like a stalker.

    If I was to follow you around all day, recording everything you do (even if I just stay in public spaces), I would be guilty of harassment and potentially criminal stalking. Flock does the same thing, just via a network of cameras instead of literally following you in person.

    There are tons of public cameras, but they’re owned by seprate individuals/companies. You’d be required to get permission from each ones owner to collect their footage, which in itself provides saftey against stalkers. The owners of that footage are in no way obligated to provide it and will likely refuse without being given a good reason. They may even still refuse until provided with a court order. That oversight, from both the footage owners and the courts that order it to be handed over, protects people from unlawful harassment, particularly stalkers.

    The fact that Flock provides anyone with a badge/title the ability to freely search a massive database for every public location a person has been, what they were wearing, how they walk, what bluetooth devices they had, their mode of transport (plus every detail about it Flock can extract), facial recognition data, and more - is terrifying. 0 oversight: no warrant, no reasonable suspicion, no evidence of a crime; just following you around hoping to catch you doing something they don’t like (regardless of whether it’s illegal activity or not).


    If you haven’t yet, you should really read that article I posted above.

    A single search query recruits that entire network as a passive tracking apparatus. An officer who sets a specific plate on a “hot list” receives an automatic alert whenever that vehicle appears anywhere in the system — across city limits, across state lines, across jurisdictions the officer has no authority in. The abuser does not need to be present. The cameras do the watching for him.




  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldThe state of things
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    22 hours ago

    HR departments get flooded with AI generated applications by the truckload making automating rejections the only viable way to keep up

    That goes both ways. Employers have been auto rejecting applicants for years, so applicants have shifted to automating applications.

    Why should someone looking for a job take the time to craft an application, when it gets rejected without a person ever actually looking at it.


    Last time I went job hunting (2yrs ago), I got a response from less than 1% of the jobs I applied to.










  • Drones are an effective tool on an open battle field; but they operate under wildly different conditions. Wide open spaces and short contacts (find target, ram to explode. They don’t have to loiter and maintain that contact).

    A pepper spray equipped drone in a school??? Tight enclosed spaces with halls and doorways (that are usually closed) you’ve got to navigate. Quad copters are loud, and that’d be amplified by that enclosed space. Without sufficient distance to keep out of reach they’d be an easy target to take down by the assailant. To use the spray, you’d have to get near, deploy it, and escape before being struck down; giving the spray to the assailant to harvest and use.

    AND they’ve only got 8min of flight time.