I’m looking to buy some security cameras for my mother in law. I currently have a small server with plenty of storage at my place that I’d prefer to use on at least a temporary basis to keep costs down. Are there any self hostable cameras that support a built in VPN? I currently use tailscale for my network but I’m open to learning something else. Alternatively, can they run over a tailscale subnet router? I don’t use that yet but if I could place a cheap node in her place to help her access footage and my other services via subnet routing I’ll do that too.

  • un_ax@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Alternatively, can they run over a tailscale subnet router?

    Yes, the cameras wouldn’t need to be aware of tailscale (or a VPN), you’d just put a pi or install tailscale on a PC there and expose the cameras over the subnet router config to your server also on tailscale.

  • exaybachae@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Anything that is just local hardware can be saved or copied to an encrypted cloud drive of your choosing, via VPN if that’s what you want.

    You don’t have to use a security cam system that hosts the cloud storage, or acts as a middle man between you and a live feed.

    There are local systems that can host remote access portals too.

    These things existed before things like ring or wyze…

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I did this using a router to handle traffic for about a year between sites 240 miles apart. The only downside was it used a lot of bandwidth.

    If your MIL’s router supports OpenWRT or you can replace it with one that does, you can use a VPN and PBR (Policy Based Routing) to your home router or server and do exactly what you want with any camera that supports RSTP (Real Time Streaming Protocol). That includes most cheap wired TP-Link cameras and plenty of others. PBR on the router at your MIL’s home would be used to route all traffic from camera IP addresses to your server.

    I used Frigate software and Home Assistant for occupancy detection/alerts and Wireguard for transport. It worked perfectly but I eventually got around to adding 2nd server.

  • shameless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I just want to throw out there the idea of using Eufy cameras for older people. The systems store offline you don’t have to pay for online storage etc. And the app and everything is very simple and easy to use.

    I know it’s not what you’re asking but I went through a similar dilemma with my MIL and went this route because she struggles enough as it is with technology.

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Not directly, but if you configure them via Home Assistant, you can download the camera footage (depending on the brand, I use Tapo) and then sync that to your server of choice via FTP or WebDAV.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This. A VPN is just a network route. Applications can’t tell the difference between a local subnet and a VPN.