• anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Okay good, they clarified that they won’t ship with it. I’ve seen people saying they will but I never read anything from Graphene or Moto stating that.

    • OpenPassageways@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Wouldn’t it be better if it DID? Wouldn’t that get around all the “tamper” detection stuff?

      Right now I have Google Play disabled in my owner profile, but it would be nice if apps in secondary profiles could pass the full Play Integrity checks… even though I’m actively trying to transition away from them.

      For example Cisco DUO says my device with GrapheneOS installed has been tampered with, and I was hoping that would go away if I could just buy the phone with GrapheneOS installed.

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 hours ago

        In the long term, yes it would be better if it shipped.

        However, if someone went to a phone store with a stock graphene on display and anything else next to it, which one do you think they’ll choose?

        Until Graphene’s stock experience (i.e stock apps and launcher) mature enough to not look out of place next to google and apple, the average Joe will pick the more polished phone. I hope improving that is a task Motorola will be able to help with, while graphene keeps doing their thing.

        Additionally with the app/play store dualopoly, Motorola would be shooting them selves in the foot if they didn’t ship with the play store.

        Getting an option beside a pixel for Grapheneos is pretty cool and a big step forward. I hope new demand will be high enough to show the decision makers that its an endeavor worth continuing.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          However, if someone went to a phone store with a stock graphene on display and anything else next to it, which one do you think they’ll choose?

          Given the past couple years I’d like to think the fraction to choose graphene would be multiple times what it would have been 5-10 years ago. But not close to a majority.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I believe the play services agreement Motorola Lenovo signs to get the play store on their devices would forbid that.

      • raldone01@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It wouldn’t go away. It will only go away if Google signs grapheneos images. Grapheneos on all supported devices support the required attestation already. It is just Google pettiness.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It’s gonna be a premium for the folding feature or some other feature on that particular model — they list two other models that are considerably less expensive and have the same amount of RAM.

    • pjusk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      iirc, as of right now, its only the expensive processors that meet the security standards GrapheneOS has. Therefore only being available in the future high-end Motorola phones.

      • TeaWithDani@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        Yup its exactly this. And with supply shortages, itll take a while to filter down in price unfortunately.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I got a deal on a new 9 from my carrier for $5 a month for 24 months.

      $120 CAD.

      But, in canada, the phones come carrier unlocked and had no issue flashing it. Though i only ever powered it on once before it was flashed - to turn on oem unlocking. The sim was not used until then. So it didn’t do any auto downloads that might have caused a problem.

      Long short: you can find them cheap if you look.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      What are the odds that it filters down?

      I’ll pick up a cheap android and put Lineage on it before I buy another flagship phone.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I was looking at the lowest end pixel for Graphene (Pixel 7) and they are still nearly $400 on the aftermarket. It’s insane.

      • excursion22@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I got a 7 Pro around 6 months ago for $280 CAD. Surely there are other less expensive sources you could find.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Where are you looking? I see Pixel 8s, used and unlocked, on ebay for $200-300.

      • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Anecdotally I bought a used pixel 9a last year for ~$350, could be regional or due to ongoing inflation though

        • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I bought a new in box old stock Pixel 9a for $350 USD a couple months ago from eBay. This was just before that Cop City protestor gave a duress password to border patrol, I wonder if that caused a bit of a spike in demand for old Pixels?

        • zewm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’m guessing inflation and the tech related bullshit. Everyone marking shit up.

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I love graphene, but I hope they’re planning to also roll out some very strong stock software - or else this will make for a very rough first impression on a large audience of normies and hurt graphene’s long run chance of success. The camera, gallery, and app store in particular will not come up to many users’ standards.

    • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My impression from the article is that the Motorola phones ship with default Android, but flashing to GrapheneOS is officially supported. So it would only be people who would be flashing GrapheneOS anyway.

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah by “switch to” they probably do mean flash. I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones but maybe that’s a later phase.

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Would you trust a pre-flashed phone though?

          I guess with GOS they have integrity checkers.

        • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones

          They do. They say it in their roadmap:

          Hardware and firmware security are core parts of the project, but it’s currently limited to research and submitting suggestions and bug reports upstream. In the long term, the project will need to move into the hardware space.

          https://grapheneos.org/faq#roadmap

        • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 hours ago

          There are some third party vendors online that ship pre-flashed GrapheneOS phones iirc, but I don’t believe there has ever been on with it factory installed.

            • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I agree, you should always flash it yourself. Though GrapheneOS does have the Auditor app to attest the integrity of the operating system against another GrapheneOS device. It’s always going to be best practice to do it yourself, however.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Motorola should be able to lead them into the right direction for this. Moto controls their own drivers and while i don’t know, i don’t expect they’re using stock android camera, they can probably just provide the camera app to graphene

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There are some really talented people working on the camera systems for Apple and Google etc. what I don’t get is surely there are some equally talented engineers (in image processing) who love open source so why aren’t they working on an open source camera platform?

      It seems an itch that’s not getting scratched.

      • Ernest@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        idk if this is the case here but on a firmware level, interfacing with these camera chips almost always requires an NDA that they’ll only sign with very large minimum orders

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Man, I would be all over the is of it was on lower end models so I can run graphene as my sketchy international travel phone. But I don’t really want to pay flagship prices for that. And I still believe in having a curated primary digital fingerprint.

    • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And I still believe in having a curated primary digital fingerprint.

      Could you please elaborate? I know what digital footprint is, minimizing and compartmentalization techniques, but not primary and curated digital footprint.

      • Aqivex@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Functional and hypothetical only example usage of a curated digital footprint, for story purposes:

        You keep, use, maintain, and preferably daily drive technology interfacing gizmos in a manner that results in a footprint where the conclusions drawn from it resolve to a “curated” set of… whatever the beholder is looking to ID from the footprint.

        Functional example:

        You keep and use devices in a manner that is at most “normie+”.

        You own a Pixel Phone but keep stock android on it and add just enough to it not make you hate your life. You use a couple of normal sub services.

        You still show some of your silly, like use an account on a porn website that federates with the world you care to socialize with. You still post how The Man better watch out.

        Same as everyone else. The fingerprint looks like what you want it to look like.

        So that it remains separate from what could happen/be happening elsewhere inside a Faraday cage with other devices there. How they are configured like, or who they talk to, the networks you utilize and the level of silly you display in your other accounts that have never so much as shared a trace route in passing together.

        That’s hypothetically separate from the curated digital identity, depending on how careful and good at it your set up was.

        So when the friendly folks with the mass surveillance pull up your file, it’s composed of what you wanted there to begin with.

        It’s just another implementation layer of minimizing and compartmentalization, really.

        Hypothetically. For a friend.

    • demonsword@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      On lower end you could go with lineageos, it’s not as good as graphere but it’s good enough IMO

  • GMac@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Sign me up for a graphene razr ultra please and thank you. Dont have any issue with self install if it doesnt ship that way

    • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Honestly? Kinda prefer it.

      Hope an updated clicks keyboard comes out for it.

      Would be the most interesting usable android phone since the LG V20 IMO

  • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is great and all, gives more device options for GOS. However, being only flagship, this will put GOS out of reach for alot of people due to the cost of flagship phones and the current economy. Especially if Google starts making future Pixels unable to have GOS flashed onto them.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Not the same company. Lenovo bought only the name of the mobile division and slapped it on their products. Google bought Motorola Mobility first, stripped it bare of all the people and IP of value and sold the name to Lenovo.