• Tahl_eN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 hours ago

      P to P is potentially laggier, especially in farther-flung areas. It’s less secure, since the server is someone’s machine. So it’s easier for cheaters to do their thing. You also need to run a whole server alongside the client, so you need to leave a reasonable amount of perf overhead on your recommended machine that you could otherwise dedicate to just running the client.

      That said, it’s cheaper to run and easier to maintain at EoL. So tradeoffs.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        Tbh that’s why community servers+p2p are the best options to have for a game - people are more than happy to host their own servers for friends and the public, and the dev doesn’t have to worry about perpetual infrastructure upkeep. Win-win.

        • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          Yeah, I missed that from the battlefield games, being able to join non dec hosted servers was the best of both worlds. Didn’t have to join a discord server to make a party but could still play on the same server enough to make friends.