• Alph4d0g@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Pronunciation of words like fauteuil. French saw -euil and apparently decided to play a sick joke on the rest of the world.

  • culprit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So do French stoners just tell each other “80 dude” or “90 everybody” if its a big party?

    • Dookieman12@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We adopted the standard. The boat with the official measurements sank on the way over, you unread swine.

      • recursivethinking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That F is zeroed out on fucking Brine makes it the most absurd thing.

        Like OK there may be an argument for base 12 or base 16 (but not both)… But a mixture of water, ice, and sodium chloride?

        Like OK blame a German I guess , but at least they were smart enough to decide, “Das ist stupid”

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          C is pretty made up too. Why water, and why sea level? Don’t complain about F if you aren’t using K, where zero actually means zero. Anything else is just picking arbitrary points that you like for one reason or another.

          • Instigate@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Why water

            Because it’s one of the most abundant resources available on earth that is imperative to our understanding of the existence of life and is the commonest solution regularly used by humans in scenarios where temperature is a relevant factor.

            why sea level?

            Because vast swathes of humanity live at or near sea level, where we already arbitrarily nominate the level of atmospheric pressure to be 1 ATM.

            While K has a natural zero-point, the gradation (by your logic) is entirely arbitrary as well because it’s based on C and not some other cosmological constant.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I know why water was chosen. Brine also has characteristics that are useful. My point was that it’s just one (specific version of a) molecule at one specific altitude, and pressure varies, so there is no true “sea level pressure”. It is not a concrete thing where zero means zero.

              Metric I love. C is not metric though. It’s an SI unit, but not metric, as often as those are conflated. It doesn’t have any fundamental advantage over F.

      • Dookieman12@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Oligarchs hijack the government to oppose the will of people, obviously that means every single US American wholeheartedly supports their oppressors. You must read so many books to be that smart.

          • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Make a comment that doesn’t do well

            Cry and say you were ragebaiting like that’s a thing people like or are ok with

            Curl up alone and night and wonder why

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      19 hours ago

      God forbid the units used by the average person in everyday life are easily divisible by whole numbers, not resulting in things like infinitely repeating decimals.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Ah yes, measuring out anything into thirds is awesome with metric. Nothing ever needs to be split into thirds.

          • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Good point. Splitting things in to 3rds is the most common function of everything. Why, just the other day I was building a box. I started by measuring the largest face of the backplate and subtracting the thickness of the side plates so I could figure out the internal volume. Most people would have done a simple equation like x-y but I prefer to do 3((x/3) - (y/3)). It’s a much cleaner method.

      • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        God forbid units used by the average person in everyday life are easily converted between, not resulting in things like ‘how many feet are in a mile’.

          • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            The main conversions would be betwren meters and centimeters ot in your case feet and inches. Those happen way more often.

            And as soon as you get slightly out of most everyday lives but still quite everyday into the realm of unit conversion betwren different things like volume, speed, power what have you imperial just falls apart.

      • bjorney@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Yeah I hate when I have to convert temperatures between systems, and then the nice round numbers that represent common values used in everyday life like 0, 20, 30, 40, and 100 become absolutely nonsensical values like 32, 68, 86, 104 and 212

        Metric measurements are only decimals in North America because things are fabricated to be round imperial numbers for the American market. When you buy a piece of lumber in Europe it’s cut to 45x95mm which (shockingly) converts to the absolutely nonsensical 1.77165x3.74016 inch two by four

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          When you buy a piece of lumber in Europe it’s cut to 45x95mm which (shockingly) converts to the absolutely nonsensical 1.77165x3.74016 inch two by four

          Ah yes, nice round numbers there as well with metric. Why isn’t it just 50x100mm? And that conversion is not even the imperial measurement of a 2x4, and you clearly don’t understand where the dimensions come from.

          There are nominal dimensions, and actual dimensions for lumber. The name 2x4 is the nominal dimension, the rough size before drying and planing. Between the forest and the hardware store, a board loses material twice.

          1. A log goes through a sawmill and gets cut into rough boards. At this point, a 2x4 really is about 2" x 4". Green (freshly cut) wood contains 30% or more moisture.

          2. The boards go into a kiln where hot air drops the moisture content to about 19%, as water leaves the cells, the board shrinks. The dried boards are rough and uneven. A planer shaves all four sides smooth. S4S (Surfaced Four Sides) means all four faces are planed. The planer removes another 1/8" or so from each face.

          Result: a board that started at 2" x 4" ends up at a standard measurement of 1-1/2" x 3-1/2".

          Now to get back to the metric equivalent… that 45x95mm board… starts with a nominal dimension of 47x100mm. Neither the nominal or actual dimensions are nice round numbers here, although at least the actual dimensions at the end are a multiple of 5. Why some places also refer to these as a 2x4, well they’re the equivalent even though the actual size is completely unrelated.
          UK example

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Not sure why you assumed I didn’t already know that (I did), but thanks for the completely pointless off topic essay I guess

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Captain Picard is French so he ought to be in a better position to answer the question than most of us.

    • Small_Quasar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Captain Picard and his brother were sent off to an old fashioned English boarding school by their luddite father that didn’t allow them to transport home in the evening or weekends, thus their English accents (my head canon).

      Picard’s brother became indoctrinated into the same fucked up luddite philosophy and didn’t even allow 24th century fire safety technology in his home, leading to the death of him, his wife and his son due to a fire (actual canon).

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Brother, thats nothing, have you seen their vowels? Vowel chart is insane:

    And also they distinguish diphtongs(like ai in pain), hiatus (like saying pain but saying it like “pa” from “papa” and then “in”) and even fucking glides so “ai” and “aj” are not the same 💀

    Edit: Fixed the image with [email protected] 's help

  • Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    44 minutes ago

    🤓 Technically there are septante, octante/huitante, nonante, but it’s either considered local to some region (belgium, switzerland, etc) or old-school