• DoomProphet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      As I’m currently building myself a house I can tell you that the wall mounted toilets are rated for 400kg at the tip,the furthermost from the wall, of the bowl.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        400kg

        That’s only 3 USAians if they are static.

        Get 250kg (combined) humping reverse cowgirl and see what forces you get.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        OK. It just seems like unnecessary engineering for the small advantage of being easier to clean under.

        • DoomProphet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s really just a steel frame that gets bolted to the wall. Further down someone linked to one from Geberit, cost like 120€. It also has the water tank.

          Easier cleaning is one thing and the best feature if you don’t care about the ecstatics. You can also chose the height freely.

    • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Why not? Wall mounted toilets like this are super common here in Europe and there’s never an issue. The big advantage is that you can more easily clean underneath them.

      What you don’t see is that the toilet isn’t actually held up by the wall itself. There’s a steel frame inside the wall linke this.

    • potpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Why? Most commercial toilets are wall mounted and get shat in way more than consumer plinth toilets.