• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think the comparison is acceptable with maybe a terminology clarification in the footnotes, because “AI” is the false term under which this current bullshit is being marketed.

    And people who believe the core mechanism in large language models to be AI are so uneducated that they will probably neither understand the distinction to legitimate AI research, nor bother to read footnotes.

    • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s exactly the thing. Those who understand such a footnote don’t need it, and those who might learn more from it are unlikely to understand it. The above commenters are simply being pedantic.