• pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think this is a tough one to weigh in on depending where you come from. If I lived somewhere where the news talked about school shootings a lot, I might want my child to have a phone.

    Go after the companies making addictive applications instead.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not that hard. You keep it in your backpack, and never take it out the whole day while school is in session.

      • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Same, and I feel like that should be the only phone available. Us older millennials didn’t have phones, these kids don’t need them either during school. Now I’m not against them used at lunch time or breaks, that’s there time

        • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          To be fair there was infrastructure then that doesn’t exist now. Most phone boxes are basically just public urinals now for example, I mean they always were but you could usually expect a phone to be in there too. People were also used to remembering numbers, but the only numbers I remember these days are my own and various landlines from my childhood which have been disconnected for over a decade as people did away with traditional landlines, then the VoIP bridge replacements which just became a way to receive international tech support scam calls more efficiently.

          I personally want to see smartphones curtailed more generally; if I had absolutist power a lot of the adtech sector (at least surveillance-based behavioural recommendation algorithms) would be legislated out of existence on public health and democratic integrity grounds for example. I’d like to see e-ink smartphones become a wider market segment too, as these inherently break a lot of ‘dark patterns’ and also make short form video content less viable in favour of text content. I don’t think we can just take smartphones off kids and dump them at eighteen into the psychological manipulation engine that is the modern adtech sector without wider structural reforms to our relationship with smartphones and the internet.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Just make them leave it off. Anyone caught using a phone gets it taken away the rest of the day.

      That’s what we did with anything that was distracting when I was growing up. You can have it on you, but if they see you using it. It goes into the principal’s office until EOD.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah the issue with this is that it becomes a major pain to enforce.

        Tones of schools have no phone policies but no one enforces it.

        Students won’t give them up and parents get upset because they can’t contact little Timmy or because his 1500 iPhone is in someone’s desk.

        • Tinks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You don’t necessarily need to take it away, there are other avenues of punishment. Detention, Saturday school, no extra-curricular participation, suspension, etc. I was in high school right as dumb cell phones started to become a thing and those were our punishments if we were caught with phones out. We were allowed to have them, but they had to be either off or on silent, and in our bags (same as CD/MP3 players.) We were allowed to have them out to check them only during lunch and before and after school, or if we had to make a call, in the main office. I completely agree that kids shouldn’t be using phones AT ALL during class time, but there’s ways to allow them to exist and punish inappropriate usage that doesn’t require teachers taking them. Teachers shouldn’t be taking phones, that’s a liability risk and not worth the effort.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      How would it help for children to have phones during a school shooting? Everyone on the staff already has one.

        • dil@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          A parent is more likely to go rambo and be helpful than cops or teachers, just look at past school shootings where cops didnt do jack sht

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      As a mom of two in a country where school shootings do happen far more frequently than anywhere else in the world, the US, I fully support completely banning phones from schools. The benefit to my kids education overall far outweighs the minuscule chance something would happen where they need their phones or a shooting took place. I say this also as a former American student who’s school did go on lock down a few times for active shooters in the area, like the time a local bank got robbed or when they found a “kill list” some kid made. It just doesn’t make sense to me to degrade education across the board in the very very off chance my kid, or even myself, was at the location of a school shooting.

      • pasdechance@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I was thinking about a shooting that happened in Norway. Some of the children called their parents. It didn’t stop anything horrible from happening, but they left the world knowing they were loved.