• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If it is malware then harshness is justified, but I’d be willing to debate over the strict definition of malware and whether it technically applies here.

    But I don’t think most of the harshness we’ve seen is actually borne of that kind of outrage. Even the OP of this meme says they are not upset and are having a wonderful time.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I never said it’s strictly malware, I said borderline malware. It can’t be strictly malware because most definitions of malware focus on the malware taking (some or full) control of the system or extracting valuable information, things that generally pose as a direct threat of damage to the end user or system.

      But restricting user access to information without the user knowing information is being restricted and taking deliberate steps to hide this is being done in the first place is all malicious behavior. If you asked from a layman if this should be considered malware behavior or not most people would consider this malware behavior, hence borderline malware.

      And I don’t see how it not being “strictly malware” would change anything. People are outraged by what it is doing and how it is doing it, not by whether it fits the strict definition of malware.