• mabeledo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Not sure what’s annoying about logind, but udev was introduced eight years before systemd was a thing.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not the binary. It’s that the logs it writes are in binary so can’t be read without a program.

      • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Even systems that use text logs, compress logs using logrotate and you have to uncompress before you can read them. Also since the compressed tar.gz logs are a bunch of separate files, if you don’t have an exact date of what you’re looking for, you have to uncompress and search through all of them. I much prefer just using journalctl

        • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I mean… zless and zgrep have been a thing since forever ago. And some distros ship with lessopen(?) preinstalled, so it’s seemless.

          There are only so many times I’m willing to put up with lost logfile due to a crash. Logrotate wouldn’t do this.

          • esc@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You can read systemd logs with strings program (part of binutils). Even if the file itself corrupted due to a crash.

          • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            But then you aren’t just using a text editor anymore. If you’re willing to use programs like zless and zgrep, then you can just as easily use journalctl. And I’ve never lost a logfile before, over many years, so not to discredit your experience but at least in my experience journald has been an upgrade

            • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Why would I ever use a text editor? I think our approaches to viewing logs are fundamentally different.

              • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Well the original comment I responded to said

                It’s not the binary. It’s that the logs it writes are in binary so can’t be read without a program.

                Of course, a text editor is also a “program”, but I assumed they were saying they preferred plain text logs.

                If you aren’t agreeing with them then you need to state your position more clearly when you hop in.