• Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I mean… zless and zgrep have been a thing since forever ago. And some distros ship with lessopen(?) preinstalled, so it’s seemless.

    There are only so many times I’m willing to put up with lost logfile due to a crash. Logrotate wouldn’t do this.

    • esc@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You can read systemd logs with strings program (part of binutils). Even if the file itself corrupted due to a crash.

    • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      But then you aren’t just using a text editor anymore. If you’re willing to use programs like zless and zgrep, then you can just as easily use journalctl. And I’ve never lost a logfile before, over many years, so not to discredit your experience but at least in my experience journald has been an upgrade

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Why would I ever use a text editor? I think our approaches to viewing logs are fundamentally different.

        • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well the original comment I responded to said

          It’s not the binary. It’s that the logs it writes are in binary so can’t be read without a program.

          Of course, a text editor is also a “program”, but I assumed they were saying they preferred plain text logs.

          If you aren’t agreeing with them then you need to state your position more clearly when you hop in.