• palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sooo, hyperbole aside, I did a quick search on the site of the retailer I last obtained parts through, right before the prices exploded, and their cheapest 1x64GB RAM DDR5 stick is about £2320.

      (Big assumption here that the motherboard only has four RAM slots. If you’re going to cram 192GB onto it, you’re going to need at least a couple of those, and preferably three, not 2x64+2x32, hence not looking at smaller capacity sticks.)

      As I write, eBay has one seller with a single 1x64GB DDR5 at a quarter of that, which makes me think they must be going by pre-explosion pricing, but it also has something at well over £10k, four times the other way (and more), so at least logarithmically, the stand-alone retailer is right in the middle.

      That means that this server is probably going to be well in excess of £10k when they finally ship it with full spec. If they’re offering a warranty or support contract, probably around £20k. (Or £30k if they do the trick of simply changing the currency sign on a US dollar amount).

      • plz1@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s not RAM slots, it’s unified memory, built into the CPU/chip. ALso means you can’t expand it later.

      • Pyotr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not that it matters much since I think your math here checks out - but the framework desktop is all soldered memory, so no slots for memory needed. Likely some higher density chips used here than a 64GB DIMM stick. Point being, your estimate may still be optimistic!

        Still don’t know why the company who prides itself on reparability and upgradibility even released a unit with unrepairable components, even given their latency justification.

          • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            It was a tradeoff between replaceable RAM or high throughput. For this device they felt the performance was more important than the ability to replace / upgrade RAM.

            • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              2 days ago

              It was more AMD than Framework AFAIK. Soldered memory is basically a requirement to run the strix halo platform.

              • wewbull@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                They’ve used LPCAMM on the Framework 13 Pro. I did wonder if they were going to update the Desktop to do the same.