• palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sooo, hyperbole aside, I did a quick search on the site of the retailer I last obtained parts through, right before the prices exploded, and their cheapest 1x64GB RAM DDR5 stick is about £2320.

    (Big assumption here that the motherboard only has four RAM slots. If you’re going to cram 192GB onto it, you’re going to need at least a couple of those, and preferably three, not 2x64+2x32, hence not looking at smaller capacity sticks.)

    As I write, eBay has one seller with a single 1x64GB DDR5 at a quarter of that, which makes me think they must be going by pre-explosion pricing, but it also has something at well over £10k, four times the other way (and more), so at least logarithmically, the stand-alone retailer is right in the middle.

    That means that this server is probably going to be well in excess of £10k when they finally ship it with full spec. If they’re offering a warranty or support contract, probably around £20k. (Or £30k if they do the trick of simply changing the currency sign on a US dollar amount).

    • plz1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s not RAM slots, it’s unified memory, built into the CPU/chip. ALso means you can’t expand it later.

    • Pyotr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not that it matters much since I think your math here checks out - but the framework desktop is all soldered memory, so no slots for memory needed. Likely some higher density chips used here than a 64GB DIMM stick. Point being, your estimate may still be optimistic!

      Still don’t know why the company who prides itself on reparability and upgradibility even released a unit with unrepairable components, even given their latency justification.

        • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was a tradeoff between replaceable RAM or high throughput. For this device they felt the performance was more important than the ability to replace / upgrade RAM.

          • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            It was more AMD than Framework AFAIK. Soldered memory is basically a requirement to run the strix halo platform.

            • wewbull@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              They’ve used LPCAMM on the Framework 13 Pro. I did wonder if they were going to update the Desktop to do the same.