• Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Can we stop spreading the propaganda for them? Sony lied about digital sales by including digital-only games in their figures.

    Every game with a physical release, according to their developers, makes most of their sales on disc. It’s literally always a 70/30 split every single time (give or take 10%). I cannot find any evidence of a game that sold more in its digital form than physical

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yes it is a conspiracy. Sony doesn’t want physical games for a whole bunch of reasons not least of which is control and greed. And if you think this is a new thing you would be wrong. They have been pushing this quietly for years. Second hand sales, game rentals, trading… these are all things that cut into Sony’s profits. If you ever want a reason follow the money.

  • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Honestly, in my lifetime I’ve bought maybe 7 physical games, and that was the Myst series.

    I was too poor when I was a kid so pirated, now I use Steam, and if that goes to shit, I’ll be sailing the seas again, just like with streaming.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    42 minutes ago

    Playstation was dead to me once they released the PS3 and did the bait and switch linux thing (again).

    Why do you care what Sony does, just avoid them all together.

    The only hope is governments deciding that you have a right (probably for a limited time, discs dont last forever) for you to have license Key that you can use, trade, barter or sell.

    But who will manage a database of keys? I hate that I am going to say this: a blockchain of key/ownership? I cant think of any other decentralized method.

    Or a home brew is going to happen that “rips” the hard drive on install and makes a copy on a USB or attached drive or something, but that brings us back to the problem: the hardware itself.

    If you don’t own the machine, you don’t own the data. You DONT own the playstation because it is proprietary and you cant do anything with it.

  • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    People keep pre-ordering absolutely everthing no matter the price because they need to have it the moment it comes out. THIS means companies can do whatever the fuck they want because people will let them do it.

    The solution is so easy stop buying their shit. Yes you won’t play on the second it comes out 6 months later its like 50% at least.

    Nothing will change because people value convenience over change.

  • bampop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    What nonsense. What matters isn’t whether we use physical disks or not. And it’s all digital anyway, you don’t get many games on vinyl these days. The real issue is whether you own the games you buy. As GOG is proving, game ownership is something that publishers can easily offer, regardless of the delivery mechanism. If Sony would step up and do the same, killing physical discs wouldn’t be a problem. It’s a trust issue.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      GOG doesn’t give you ownership of the game the way physical media does though. Unless they’ve added a feature to sell your used games?

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Download the offline installer and now you have possession.

        Further, because GOG enforces no DRM or mandatory sign-ins, so that means that you also have control over that copy of the game - you can install it and play it however and whenever you see fit.

        For GOG games were you downloaded and kept the offline installer, the only way that the rightsholder has of stopping you from installing and playing that game is to sue you, which is:

        • Almost certainly not worth it for then due to the cost of taking somebody to court for it versus what they would gain if they won.
        • They actually have to have an actual legal basis for unilateraly changing the licensing agreement with you and hence be allowed to block you from continuing with the activity you have a license for (installing and running that game), which they almost certainly do not have in pretty much the whole World since EULAs aren’t valid there (they’re considered an attempt at, after a sale is completed, forcing unilateral changes to the implicit contract which is the sale, so have no legal validity)

        With other stores they can just force the store to take down the game and now it’s up to YOU to sue THEM to get restitution and the “not worth it” is now something that goes against you (unless you have access to a Small Claims Court in the jurisdiction you’re in, are you really going to sue them for a 50 bucks game?)

        In fact, physical media is worse than digital GOG games, because the former can have phone-home DRM or mandatory sign-ins so you have possession but not control.

        PS: However if the point you were making was about resale, then it’s a valid point. Mind you, physical media with phone-home DRM or mandatory sign-ins can also be de facto unsellable if that’s what the game maker wants.

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Good point, I’m guessing it probably falls short of physical media in that way. As I understand it, they let you download an install file for the games you purchase, which you can save and use offline. I doubt that publishers would put effort into enabling a second hand games market

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    No, I made the choice for physical. I don’t own a single digital game on a Sony console. Don’t put this on me. I want to buy physical. I never wanted digital for myself. I always wanted choice.

    Its just that I don’t matter. I’m a minority and Sony don’t give a fuck about me. It’s not my fault Sony is stopping physical production. Its still profitable, so Sony could keep on doing it. But they don’t because they want to fuck me over.

    Damned be the man who blames the consumer and he can shove his worked at Valve credentials up his ass.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      He’s right though. The consumer has chosen sure a small minority might buy physical but the majority don’t.

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I had a PS4, witch was sold and didn’t have coonsole for years. Then I got a PS5 and my account was deleted with all my purchases.

    That didn’t happen to my steam games.

    The problem is the legislation around digital consumers rights.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Sony has released very few single player games this generation on purpose. Single player games are perfect for physical media.

    Sony wants everyone to play live service games to sell the game, the updates and the online subscription. It is part of the plan.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So some people bought digital and therefore that is justification to get rid of physical?

  • KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Companies offer games as a digital download or physical disc.

    Consumers buy physical disc out of a desire to preserve media.

    Game is unplayable off the disc without a 98GB download that installs a digital copy of the game onto the hardware. Disc is essentially a physical license to play the game and is useless otherwise.

    “You chose this”

    Fuck right off. At this point, if a game isn’t either available on GoG or as a FitGirl RePack, it does not register as an option for me anymore. That is my choice.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      and seems like ppl don’t realize the disc being the license means when the dig store removes the dig licenses it’ll also remove the versions that apply to that 98gb update for a disc license.