That’s the guy who said ‘frankly some women’s bodies just actually don’t work for wearing Lululemon pants. It’s really about the rubbing through the thighs, how much pressure is there over a period of time, how much they use it,’ right?
Yeah? He’s still responsible for them. I never said he was a good person or that he was wrong, just that men are responsible for this “false advertising” as you so eloquently put it.
I’m not arguing with you that the pants make women’s butts look better and that it may disappoint you when you manage to bed one. I am arguing that it’s not advertising because women are humans and our society stopped explicitly selling those a while ago.
That’s a very obtuse response. Idk why you’d ask people to change your mind when you don’t want your mind changed, but I have a job to do that doesn’t involve convincing you that advertising is not for human beings. Have fun with your thread.
Chip Wilson?
That’s the guy who said ‘frankly some women’s bodies just actually don’t work for wearing Lululemon pants. It’s really about the rubbing through the thighs, how much pressure is there over a period of time, how much they use it,’ right?
Yeah? He’s still responsible for them. I never said he was a good person or that he was wrong, just that men are responsible for this “false advertising” as you so eloquently put it.
I’m not arguing with you that the pants make women’s butts look better and that it may disappoint you when you manage to bed one. I am arguing that it’s not advertising because women are humans and our society stopped explicitly selling those a while ago.
I don’t think anyone here is arguing against the fact that women are human.
That’s a very obtuse response. Idk why you’d ask people to change your mind when you don’t want your mind changed, but I have a job to do that doesn’t involve convincing you that advertising is not for human beings. Have fun with your thread.
I’m talking about yoga pants being push up bras for asses and you’re getting into whether women are human beings or not.