• Séimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I would also argue that few people have made a very good case connecting peoples concerns to capitalism. So to many it has a Southpark-ish ring to it: capitalism is bad. Don’t do capitalism. It’s an abstract thing, and abstract opponents make people feel despair and impotence.

    The most persuasive people I’ve seen don’t use that word often. They directly link peoples concerns to inequality (unfair taxation and employment laws), climate ( fossil fuel companies) and unregulated abusive businesses such as big tech.

    Those are not faceless, abstract entities, so people can organise their (justified) anger better.

    Has anybody else heard good approaches for helping people understand ?

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      I’ve found “You work all day and get a small salary. The business owner sits around, and gets a huge payout. Does that seem fair?” is moderately effective.

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      If you’re willing to go “you’re absolutely right! What a good point!” every time the person you’re talking to aligns with you even a little bit like “you’re absolutely right, you work so hard it’s completely unfair you’re taxes are so high… and the taxes of the wealthy are so low in comparison!” they feel smart and validated and might not even notice you tacked on your own commentary and also avoid buzz words it’s actually not that difficult to talk to people in an effective way.

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Presenting as a truck driving blue collar good ole boy before subtly bringing up how much we lose to income tax while the wealthy pay next to nothing is my technique. If they defend the wealthy they’re lost to the boot polish, but that’s pretty uncommon in my experience.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The most persuasive people I’ve seen don’t use that word often. They directly link peoples concerns to inequality (unfair taxation and employment laws), climate ( fossil fuel companies) and unregulated abusive businesses such as big tech.

      This is the way. Lefty movements have rightly been criticized for being too academic. Expressing people’s concerns in a more relatable and practical way gets more people on board.