• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because you have to pay a good chunk of a year’s salary for one, store it around your house somewhere, and then when you finally do get to use it, there are a million other people with the same idea and you have to compete just for space in which to use it.

    And that’s before you get to all the maintenance the government has to spend on the paths (and make you pay tax for all that). Oh, and it’s incredibly dangerous, so dangerous that it’s one of the leading causes of death in the US.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      We are talking about an equivalent ‘pod/train car’, not a car but I’ll bite anyway

      Have you ever been on a train? It sucks, a bus 10000% more, buses fuckin suck so much, I’m sorry for you to hear this in the echo chamber which features ‘fuck cars’.

      Like I said, trains and buses have 2 big negatives:

      limited availability and is extremely restrictive in where it can go

      Trains especially so, my local train would be a 20-30 minute walk away and it goes far south and to the city, if i don’t want to go to either of those I’m in for a 5 hour marathon of a trip at best

      But we should invest more in trains you might be saying, and again the question goes back to, why would a train be better than a pod/car that can roll around on train tracks

      This whole thread took the original meaning and warped it into a circle jerk about trains which is not what the OP was saying

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Have you ever been on a train? It sucks, a bus 10000% more, buses fuckin suck so much

        Skill issue. Japan, Korea, China all have extremely comfortable and efficient trains. Trains can be quite nice if the government is interested in having good trains instead of making infinitely dollars for the shareholders while spending nothing on maintaince and charging as much as possible.

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          Thanks for mentioning Japan and Korea

          https://files.ikt.id.au/y0q8ls.webp

          Japan, South Korea and North Korea would all fit into a space the size of our second smallest state Victoria but that state has a population of 8 million, the combined Korea’s and Japan would be 200 million

          Speaking of large population sizes:

          We are nearly as big as China but with 1.4 billion, if you took their desert which has fuck all trains and transposed that onto Australia we’re actually pretty close in terms of trains and public transport

          But regardless:

          One in Four Japanese Households Do Not Own A Car

          https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h00416/auto-appeal-fades-one-in-four-japanese-households-do-not-own-a-car.html

          Which leaves 3 in 4 who do own a car, so much for skill issue right :)

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 minutes ago

            if you took their desert which has fuck all trains

            They run hundreds of trains a day between population centers in that desert, I took them to get to Kazakhstan and back.

            skill issue

            The skill issue is being able to build efficient, comfortable, cheap trains, which Japan has the first 2, but they could be cheaper.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The only reason cars are good right now is because countries like US and AU went 100% all in on cars. Do you have any idea the astronomical cost of public roads and car infrastructure? Imagine if we invested the same amount into a really really good train and tram system. Or, alternatively, imagine if we underfunded roads the same way we do public transport.

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The only reason cars are good right now is because countries like US and AU went 100% all in on cars

          Not 100%, Melbourne kept its trams around and Victoria still has massive car use

          We’re just a huge massive low density country so it’s hard to compare to inner western europe

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I take the train and the bus all the time, it’s awesome. No traffic, no road rage, no anxiety, no danger. I just shitpost on My phone until I’m at My destination.

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Have you ever been on a train? It sucks, a bus 10000% more, buses fuckin suck so much, I’m sorry for you to hear this in the echo chamber which features ‘fuck cars’.

        Have you?

        Trains and buses, when funded, are fine. Millions of people take them every day.

        I work from home but I used to daily commute by train. Walk to station. Wait a few minutes. Get on. Arrive at destination. I read so many books and finished so many games.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That’s not a general problem with trains that proves they suck. The suck is places have been built out for cars with other modes as after thoughts.

            I live somewhere with much better train and bus coverage, and it makes it easier than driving for the vast majority of trips.

            The day to day suffering is because of cars. So fuck cars. Fuck the culture that made them primary.

            • ikt@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I mean if you are only going around the city sure but even in not just bikes favourite country the limitations are obvious

              With a total road network of 139,000 km, including 3,530 km of expressways,[2] the Netherlands has one of the densest road networks in the world; much denser than Germany and France, though not as dense as Belgium.[3]

              On the roads it has grown continuously since the 1950s and now exceeds 200 billion km travelled per year,[8] three quarters of which are done by car.[9] Around half of all trips in the Netherlands are made by car, 25% by bicycle, 20% walking, and 5% by public transport.[9]

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_in_the_Netherlands

              But that’s a tiny country country that is extremely flat

              As soon as you get out into a real world the problems are obvious

              Is A High-Speed Rail Possible In Australia? | Utopia

              https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8av3knflbQo

      • Culf@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Sure badly built or unprioritized public transit infrastructure might suck, but busses and trains sure are amazing when prioritised, built correctly.

        Many European cities combine well functioning train, bus and cycle infrastructure, which together makes it possible to go anywhere at any time for cheap.

        I think it really just comes down to prioritizing to develop the infrastructure (costs money and requires political will to move away from car based infrastructure).

        Also I don’t think a pod system would solve any of the problems of either cars or trains/busses and would be much more expensive…

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          can you name all these European cities combining well functioning train, bus and cycle infrastructure outside of the netherlands? (where the average person/household does not have a car as they don’t need it)

          • iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Public transportation seemed to work well in Brussels, Paris, Prague, Copenhagen, and even Edinburgh. Just thinking of the last few cities I was in outside of the Netherlands (leaving out the USA, which is obviously a nightmare for transportation of all kinds). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Buses are the worst (actually, pneumatic tyred ‘trams’ are the worst)

        Trains are great though.

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          yeah tbh i was being a bit hyperbolic, i don’t mind my train trip to work despite it being slow af

          but it would take an insane public transport network to service south east queensland, until we find an infinite money glitch it’s only going to be used for a minimum viable amount of very popular trips, eg between brisbane and the gold coast and soon the sunshine coast

          but for example if you want to go to crows nest from brisbane there will never be a train that goes that way because of low numbers

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Brisbane was built by car users for car users. If you go to central Melbourne, that’s a great place to catch the tram because it was built for the tram. On the other hand, the Melbourne suburbs stink ass because they were built after cars became popular.