• ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      How can something be a fact if it’s incorrect?

      If they release server software required to run online games, they indeed can last forever.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Unless you use private servers rather than matchmaking systems and publisher hosted servers.

      I can still play the now 19 years old call of duty 4: modern warfare. Online multiplayer works just fine and Activision doesn’t have to do a damn thing to maintain it.

      Younger gamers may not know this, but all online games used to work this way, you’d hit the “online multiplayer” button and the game would start populating a list of player-managed servers hosting games.

      It has always been a superior system to automatic matchmaking, and it still is.

    • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, I guess the thousands of hours I spent on private servers like runescape, GTA:SA and TF2 were just a fucking figment of my imagination.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ackchually, the heat death of the universe means that nothing lasts forever. Therefore, boycotting asshole big game companies run by billionaires that oppose the stop killing games makes no sense!

      Also, why do we punish murderers? Their victims would die anyway, it’s a scientific fact.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not true. They can, if the games are made to last forever (besides any game not being compatible to hardware and software, but we are talking about the online functionality here right?). In example by allowing community servers, so it does not depend on the servers from the company. Besides the fact that some games can be played offline without online functionality, like Street Fighter in example. Or do you mean by “online games” as “online required only games”.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I just explained it to you. There are online games that are build to last forever. What type of online game do you mean?

        • MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I would use Minecraft as a counterpoint considering it’s perfectly reasonable that someone could play the game exclusively online using nothing but community servers while completely ignoring all single player experiences (which I’d argue hasn’t truly existed in a long time since the game now hosts a local server which you connect to during “single player”), but I get the feeling you’d still take issue with that example because it does still have a single player experience you could do.

          So for a (as far as I recall, it’s been years since I last played it) multiplayer only experience: TF2 and its community servers. Valve could shut down all of their own servers for TF2 tomorrow and (aside from a hiccup in operation with making a server to distribute the list of community servers or making some other work around) the game would still have a thriving online community.