• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    And issue is it needs to be a specific platform.

    From a game developer’s perspective (who isn’t a pro linux dev or anything), they can support a platform. They support Windows 10. Or Windows 11. They can support stock Ubuntu. They can support a SteamOS image.

    They cannot specifically support your personalized Arch config.

    Linux’s fragmentation has always been an issue in this regard, as they can’t legally support thousands of different possible system configurations.


    HOWEVER,

    I think supporting Proton + SteamOS would be very reasonable for a dev. That is a specific platform, its codebase and infrastructure can stay unified with the Windows version, and support for that would practically mean support in other Linux distros.

    And SteamOS by itself is getting big.

    • quadrant5835@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Agreed. And truly developers don’t need to actually “support” Linux; mostly they just need to not intentionally block games from working.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Well, it would be massively, massively better if they did some basic validation and tuning in a Proton environment.

        Thousands of open-source-dev man-hours patching in hacky workarounds for Windows games not ideal; it’d be far easier for the game dev to fix things (or raise issues) from their end. And those Proton devs have better things they could be doing.