• AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Cars didn’t need apps in the 1900’s and they sure as hell don’t need them now.

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Change it from they block GOS to they spy on you. Get it in front of as many people as possible. If they get huge negative press they’re more likely to change.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They literally murdered millions and were in the press about it. I think they don’t care about headlines anymore.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is highly misleading. Hopefully there’s a link in the article to the original report on the GrapheneOS forums, where they talk about the app update breaking it on multiple platforms, not just GrapheneOS. It does not appear to be a block.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It doesn’t need it, it will drive just fine without app connection, but it provides convenient remote access and control capabilities.

        • FatVegan@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 hours ago

          My first car was a 1992 honda civic. As time went on and cars cot more modern, i yearned for a more modern car. Infotainment seemed like so much fun, all thr convenient knick knacks and gizmos.

          Now, unironocally my dream car is my 1992 honda civic from back in the day

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            90s Civic or Miata has been my dream forever, I’m with ya.

            Two pieces of modern tech, though: security and sound.

            90s Civics were notoriously easy to steal, so I’d definitely want something to prevent that.

            When I was younger, I’d always dreamed of having a nice sound system in my car, but could never afford to do it. Now that I have a car with a super nice sound system and a sub, I can never go back. No “infotainment” BS tho, just gimme a standard deck. USB support is nice, but an aux jack is all I really need.

            • FatVegan@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              In my civic i installed a “killswitch”, which was just a hidden switch to turn on the fuel pump. Not really sure how much that would prevent theft in the real world, but i think it was hard enough to find that someone trying to steal the car would rather give up than spending more time on this car. I had a pretty good sound system, which i wouldn’t need anymore. Infotainment is super overrated, my dream setup now is just something that mirrors my phone

              • Spot@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                We had an old manual Ford Escort that we had drilled the ignition out of and put a switch in instead. No one figured it out without us telling them (friends family borrowing). Ours wasn’t even really hidden, just unexpected… thieves rarely want to spend extra time and effort on unexpecteds.

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Well there’s always buying an old beater or a classic and restoring it. But you’d have to go more than 40 years back to find cars that are entirely without digital components.

        • filcuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That would not even be legal on today’s roads, at least in EU for new vehicles.

        • 17jGuFCOn89iY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s the one modern feature I wouldn’t want to give up. Cooling my car down before I get in it without having to walk out to it is very nice.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Infotaiment system. It integrates your audio library, your maps, contacts and other apps seamlessly. You get current traffic info, automatic updates and huge app library (for example CoMaps and many apps for public chargers). Integrated infotamiment system were left far behind years ago.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You get all that through android auto. The manufacturer app is for when you’re not in the car.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Oh, I thought we’re talking about android auto. If this is the specific car app it’s a different story, yes.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Class action for unilaterally modifying the agreement about feature access after the fact and to the detriment of the consumer.

  • pimat@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    10 hours ago

    How are all these governments and companies managing to enshitify everything? Yet, when it comes to real problems like world hunger, child poverty, and exploitation, no one even blinks an eye.

    • tonyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The thing nobody is willing to admit is if free food and shelter for everyone becomes a thing, the population would explode. Every system in nature needs a balance. Any organism, animal, living thing, humans included, will increase in population until the limit of resources is hit. We have no natural predators so our population is limited solely by the resources we have access to. Feeding everyone would actually increase the problem of trying to feed everyone.

      • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        Time is a resource, and in the modern world where near-full time parental involvement is assumed, it would effectively limit reproduction.

        Matter of fact, it is entirely possible that is a significant part of why birthrates keep declining.

    • antbricks@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They can make safety, fuel efficiency, usability, and comfort improvements AND enshittify things too! These are complicated machines.

    • snoons@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No one makes short term profit off of solving world hunger, so it doesn’t get solved. 🙈

    • anon5621@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Holy crap I miss old times 2013 when nobody was even bothering and all bootloaders was unlocked by default no play integrity just do what u wanna do with ur own device

  • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    i want a car with zero touchscreen. Heck, even no reverse camera - older folks have been driving just fine for years with just the side and rear mirrors. 3 pedals.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      The title makes it sound intentional. The reality is because they added a security feature that verifies the integrity of the OS. Only to make it work on other OS they have to manually add it, but the number of users is so small that they don’t even think about it. This was Google’s intention when adding it.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Their intent was to block third party app, not GOS specifically. GOS not working is a side effect.

      Why blocking third party? As said below: to force the use of privacy invasive apps, and collect more data.

      Now they will change course only if they suffer from a sufficient backlash. And that needs to be painful enough to deter other car makers from doing the same.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I dunno if this is a rhetorical game we play with ourselves in our heads but whether it’s or it isn’t, we know exactly why they are doing it and we have for many years.

      Your car has an active cellular connection whether you pay to rent time on it or not and it transmits your location, an ID number, usage habits including driving controls, music preferences, and possibly keywords spoken while in or near the vehicle, to the manufacturer. They relay that data to the government who uses it to learn who you associate with and when and where, and they sell it to your insurance company who monitors you for risky behavior, and they also sell it to advertisers who also profile you to device what the best things to try and sell you will be.

    • lokalhorst@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Why would they let people in who don’t want to share their data? They can’t make money out of you. So they try to force an OS on you that has spying enabled by default. And if you don’t comply, then fuck you nerd.

  • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Is there really a ton of overlap between people privacy-conscious enough to install graphene on their phone and people who care so little that their car has an app?

    • WereCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Basically all new cars have an app, you don’t have a choice if you’re buying new

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        My 2012 Toyota has an ‘app’ that I maybe tried once over ten years ago but haven’t used since. This is nothing new. It is called “Toyota Entune”

        • WereCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well, I have Corolla and I use the app mainly in winter to start the car and unfreeze front and rear windows. It’s quite convenient