• 6_Electrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      You do know in a significant number of languages in this world when gender is unknown the masculine form is used… Some languages, for example Spanish, would even use a masculine form for when the gender is known and a group includes both boys and girls. For example Tengo tres ninos… That sentence could mean I have three boys but it also could mean I have three kids of which some might be female.

      So stop trying to be provocative… You’re bad at it

      • TheThunderWolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        im not trying to be provocative im trying to be progressive

        this is english: we have gender neutral terms, which should for many reasons be used

        many people (including myself) find misgendering to be offensive, and many people (including myself) find complicity in the patriarchy offensive

        and also in those other languages people and organizations still often favour gender neutral language; in spanish the forms -e or -i or -x or -@ are somewhat common, i see signage using -x or -e, and spam texts sometimes use -@

        and also, why would you not adjust? saying “they” won’t hurt you

        • forbiddencherry@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Intentionally misgendering is offensive, but that’s not what happened here, in my opinion. There’s nothing in their profile so sure going neutral with they/them is probably a safer option, but defaulting to male pronouns (which traditionally are all encompassing) is also fine, IMO. If they had a preference that they cared about then they would specify it.