• qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    There’s so much plastic lining that paper otherwise everything would get too soggy anyway. Yay for glass and metal. Reusable beats disposable, no matter what it’s made of

    • wunami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Some poorly made reusable shopping bags rip or otherwise break before they get used enough times to break even with the single use disposable plastic shopping bags they are supposed to replace. Especially the cheap ones bring given out as freebies.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        57 minutes ago

        That’s bullshit from the oil companies. They did a “study” that concluded that, but if you read the methodology, they made the assumption that the reusable bag would be unusable after 20 uses.

        Meanwhile I’ve been going to the grocery store every week for quite a few years using the same bags without much issue. I’ve had one strap on a bag break after ~10 years of use, so there’s that I guess. Still haven’t thrown it out, keep meaning to repair it which I never get around to doing.

        Anyway, if you read between the lines of the study conducted by the oil companies, if you reuse the bag more than 20 times (half a year of going to the grocery store every week) you are reducing plastic waste.

    • Photonic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This image looks like right wing corpo propaganda to me. Not only does it divert the attention away from the handful of megacorporations emitting 80% of all green house gases, it is attacking a moderate leftist – who admittedly causes a relatively large amount of greenhouse gases.

      But Taylor Swift is not making most of those flights on a personal basis. It’s to provide a service to fans. So in that sense we can regard the emissions as those of Taylor Swift the company. And in that sense they are much lower than many other companies who we often give a free pass.

      So, yes hold the big emitters responsible, but let’s start with the 57 on the list and work our way down to Taylor Swift.

      • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Taylor swift is a leftist just like my racist boss has a black friend and is thus not racist.

      • |IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Bingo.

        It invites hatred from a sizeable (though perhaps potentially less politically-aware) fan base that might otherwise be receptive.

        Using someone as popular as Swift as a target for less-pop-culture-interested folks who are politically informed is clearly kicking the hornets’ nest to stir up in-fighting among the working class.

        Next time use Bezos or one of the other folks who showed up in that “Dialog” secret society since they also use private jets in the same way someone like Swift does, but in addition are far worse in every other way and who also lobby with their billions towards worsening the world in every way imaginable.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          Yeah, if you convinced Taylor Swift to stop using a private plane, it’s analogous to fast food companies switching to paper straws while keeping everything else plastic. It helps, but it’s just demanding a token solution instead of taking on the bigger problem.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        So I’ve wanted to do this for a minute…

        But how many paper straws would you have to use to offset one of these explosions? How long would it take to offset one of these explosions through straw use?

        Writing this now I was surprised by the results…

        Source for plastic v paper straw data

        So apparently plastic straws are actually more carbon neutral than paper straws, but for the purposes of this analysis I’m going to carry it through to find out how long it takes to create equivalent emissions.

        Paper straws:

        Call it 1430 grams of emissions per straw (which is wild btw)

        Plastic straws:

        Call it 610 per plastic straw. Still wild for something which weighs less than a gram.

        This is also from the thesis

        So yeah… not great.

        Gonna be using 825 tons of carbon dioxide emitted from Hank Green’s video.

        I think Hank is working in US standard units here… which is also weird and annoying but whatever… We’re getting to units of rocket explosion per straw so it’s fine…

        And I’m going to be using 500 million straws per day, which is cited in the thesis from a 2017 study and repeated elsewhere in other studies on this.

        It’s not great but what even are we doing here…

        I don’t know how we get a plastic straw versus compostable straw use rate (what proportion of straws are still plastic versus how many are now paper or some other alternatives)

        But we get 820 additional grams of emissions for each straw swapped.

        500 tons to grams is:

        838238016

        Divided by the difference in co2e foot print per straw…

        838238016 / 820 is about 1022240, in other words, about a million.

        So for about every million straws swapped from plastic to paper, one giant fiery rocket explosion of CO2 emissions occurs.

        The US consumes straws at a convenient rate of 500 million a day, so if ALL of those straws were converted to paper, we’re setting off about 500 of those explosions per day.

      • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Have you noticed the intense UV this summer? I think he legit ripped a hole in the ozone layer with that explosion.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      taylor swift’s private plane is a 1947 boeing b-47 stratojet?

      girl’s got style.

  • drath@lemmy.drath.ru
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 minutes ago

    The only reason you even need a straw in the first place instead of drinking from the cup like a normal human being, is because fast food chains dilute your drinks with frozen water.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      NGL I like my cola as cold as possible.

      But any iced beverage just feels wrong to rawdog.

      I don’t drink as much soda as I used to…but I do love me some cold brew iced coffee. I wouldn’t want to rawdog that, and I make it at home. I use a reusable straw, tho. I only use disposable straws for boba and smoothies because I can’t find good girthy reusable straws.

      And restaurateurs that aren’t idiots run their soda machines at a ratio that accommodates for the ice.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      I had bought these microwavable curry dinner boxes…like an MRE type thing. Mighta been noodles. Idr.

      It came in a plastic bowl with all the ingredients individually wrapped in plastic.

      Remember the episode of Futurama, where Fry had to assemble his own oreos? Like that.

      BUT…in addition to this, they greenwashed the whole thing by including the most worthless bamboo spork I had ever seen. Like it was flat…so not spoony…but also had rounded edges around the tines, so not exactly forky either. It was less comfortable to eat from than a toddler fork. An actual waste of bamboo, if there is such a thing.

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Well, it’s nice to be able to see the two tones in the two tone slushy. I guess that’s why. Not great for the environment though as you say.

  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I mean waxed paper cups aren’t super, they are likely better than plastic, but the wax is likely a fossils fuel byproduct

    • turdas@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I believe they increasingly use PLA which is a bioplastic. But yeah it used to be, and in many cases likely still is, polyethylene which is an oil product.

      • Axiochus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        PLA is not compostable or anything of the sort. So honestly it’s more of a “this plastic could be recycled, given that it’s sorted out from the other plastic, and given financial viability”.

        Edit: as pointed out below, it’s more correct to say that it’s not home-compostable

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          PLA very much is compostable, but only in composting facilities designed to handle bioplastics, which most aren’t (and also additives like pigments likely aren’t compostable).

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Yeah, unfortunately without some true dedication home composters do not have enough fuel (or material balance) to hit the temps required to compost PLA. It works great if you’ve got a hot composter, if you’re interested in the DIY side of things, but generally you need several households worth of input (or as in my area, a community garden with shared composting) to be able to reliably decompose PLA.

      • candyman337@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        PLA isn’t food safe though, and it’s only bio degradable in very specific circumstances, and that ““biodegradable”” status also means it puts off tons of micro plastics

        • turdas@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think you’re thinking of 3D printed PLA which indeed typically isn’t food safe. Industrially produced PLA can be food safe and it’s used in a lot of food packaging, disposable cutlery etc.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 minutes ago

          PLA itself absolutely is food safe, and a significant plurality of plastic disposable forks and spoons are made from it these days. (To be clear [edit], this is the material itself typically in an injection moulded final product. FDM 3D printed objects made out of it are not food safe, at least not more than once, because of the layer lines in which bacteria and other cooties can hide.)

    • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yup, just looked it up from your comment because it made me realize that I had no idea what wax was actually made of.

      Paraffin wax is a colorless solid derived from petroleum, coal, or oil shale, consisting of hydrocarbon molecules

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        Hence the likely a fossil fuel byproduct. But let’s be real the cost associated with using beeswax would be unbelievable

  • brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve never seen the one on the right. I’m guessing this is an American thing?

    • frog@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes, corporations guilt tripped Americans to use shittier products while they spill their garbage in the water.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They went to styrofoam for a while, but that’s hated now, so they’ve gone to the clear plastic. I hate it, it sweats in the cup holder, a lot. And the ice melts, and the drink warms up much faster.

      They have biodegradable styro, but people don’t understand the difference, so they get just as worked up over the good styrofoam as the bad. So they just pivot to the worst possible option, plastic.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      also same in Australia

      pretty sure this is just engagement bait for lemmy, seems to have worked