• 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its mostly billionaires who will be able to benefit from life extension… do you really want a world where trump, musk, and all their silicon valley friends rule the world until they turn 300 years old?

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why do you think that? We already benefit from life extension. And why only 300?

    • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you’re that worried, start working towards killing them. Seems like it’s going to be necessary step either way to correct many problems in the world. What’s one more reason for the pyre?

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      No worries about that, there is no changing the maximum age seemingly, not unless you genetically engineered babies with tech we don’t have yet.

      Everyone is born with stem cells that carry so many copies of cells that are preprogrammed to die after a point to then be replaced by those stem cells. No drug can make more copies after the fact.

      Then of course the dna gets denatured just by radiation and pollution and time.

      Neither of these will or can be solved after someone is born. They can extend the average lifespan of a group, but they can’t exceed the maximum, which has remained constant throughout human history even as the average has changed drastically.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        All of those things seem to be related to information processing, not any inherent property of atoms.

        “Then of course the dna gets denatured just by radiation and pollution and time.”

        Pretty sure “dna” isn’t just present in one cell in the body.

        Also, how can two thirty year olds make a zero year old baby?

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Have you read anything about this before espousing your grand pronouncements here?

          Seriously, like, you are so far in left field here, I can’t even respond.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            https://vadim.oversigma.com/MAS862/Project.html

            But lay on MacDuff, pour your great knowledge upon me. Tell me how a carbon atom knows it’s in a thirty year old body or 95 year old?

            “Also, how can two thirty year olds make a zero year old baby?”

            Surely you can respond to this puzzler? Even if I’m in the left field of the Andromeda Galaxy?

            Explain away, professor!

            • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              If you want to address the scientific points I made, I will respond. Your poetry is neither here nor there, pal.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        What’s the maximum? About 120?

        Imagine having 100 or more healthy years. That seems like sci-fi, but may be possible one day still.

        It will also mean working until you’re 100 before the national pension kicks in unfortunately lol

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Around 120 is maximum yes. I think some french woman might have gotten near 130 but I forget.

          Unless you believe the bible, in which case hundreds and hundreds of years. And woman was made from man’s rib. Makes sense.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            They nearly had me in the first quarter, but now I no longer believe I’ll ever see it. Not enough young people are born. My generation is enough to support the current old people, but there won’t be enough people to support my generation.

            • Rooster326@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Are there enough people at the current system where the top 1% get 99% of the resources? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

              But there will 100% be enough people to keep the basics going

              We are thousands of times more efficient than we were a couple hundred years ago.