For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      FF support is getting worse and worse though.

      Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.

      Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.

      Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        Fun fact: many sites that say that they don’t support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox “less secure” or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work

        (Not all sites ofc)

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Fun fact: you don’t seem very bright.

          By “support FF” I mean “can be used in firefox or a derivative with comparable features to chrome”.

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              29
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Those sites will be dead to me :)

              QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

              • Ghoelian@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 hours ago

                On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).

                I still won’t actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.

              • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                Unfortunately, we’re fighting an uphill battle here.

                We’d need government regulation “protecting privacy”, instead they seem all too eager to concede that in a futile effort to " protect the children ".

                • Axolotl@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 hour ago

                  I doubt SearXNG is going to integrate it lmao, and if they do, someone will fork or i will keep using older versions

      • Seldon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        For people who want an opinionated browser… Yes. They have sponsored shortcuts which cannot be disabled and they ghost out the option to in the settings. If you want to dig around the about:config and tweak things, fine, but I’d rather use a browser I can make my own. Librewolf is excellently bare bones.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Sponsored shortcuts? They don’t have them, i did a clean install only some week ago so i doubt it’s a new thing

        • NakedNateRollerSkate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I haven’t seen any of those things yet, but I’ll try to keep an eye out. The only one I noticed was a default search engine to Google, but DDG was an easy enough option. I like libre wolf as well, but I’m not a fan of the updating scheme on my system.