RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up1713arrow-down1182
arrow-up1531arrow-down1imageJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldRestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square133fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up32·2 months agoNo, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
minus-squareZkhqrD5o@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·2 months agoMy favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
minus-squaredejected_warp_core@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoAs long as it’s their autocrat, yes.
No, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
My favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
As long as it’s their autocrat, yes.