RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1565arrow-down1133
arrow-up1432arrow-down1imageJust give me someone to vote for who is normallemmy.worldRestrictedAccount@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29·1 day agoNo, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
minus-squareZkhqrD5o@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 day agoMy favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
minus-squaredejected_warp_core@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 hours agoAs long as it’s their autocrat, yes.
No, the right is also morally and legally corrupt.
My favourite logical fallacy is this: big, democratic government having control is bad, there’s too little oversight and too much corruption. Therefore, it is better if a billionaire, who rules autocratically without any oversight, is better.
As long as it’s their autocrat, yes.