• Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I can’t remember the name, but when the internet was just starting and there were a lot of search engines with no dominate ones, there was an aggregator program that you could input many search engines into, then use it as the searching tool. It would query all the engines and combine, sort, rank, and remove duplicate finds.

      The reason I mention it is because we’re sort of back at that point. Google is failing, Bing never was great, and all the alternatives have their issues, usually with not having the same database to work with. So if you gathered all the best ones, the ones without ties to corporate or AI, then put their results together, maybe you’d have something like what Google was at its peak before “do no evil” got painted over.

      Incidentally, Google became what it was/is because it gobbled up a lot of those early search engines’ databases. I miss you, Hotbot. You were a good one.

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Search used to be so good. I had an old Honda civic that suddenly wouldn’t start. It wasn’t the starter, alternator, or battery. I managed to find a forum post with my exact issue, which was that a small rubber piece on the clutch pressed a button to “tell” the starter it was okay to start. Twenty minutes later I had zip tied a piece of plastic into place and had a working car again.

        If I tried to diagnose that same issue today, it’d be dozens of SEO garbage slop sites without any actual useful information.

        • unglueclass23@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          38 minutes ago

          I was thinking the same thing recently. It’s not the place it once was. But in general the internet has changed a lot. And it’s not just AI.

          1. All sorts of paywalls especially in news sites.
          2. Everything is getting centralized into a few sites and they’re usually either not poorly indexable or not at all (Discord, facebook, X, Instagram and so on)
          3. Fediverse (Lemmy, Mastodon) also struggles with search engines.
          4. People trying to sell you shit, create a brand even more than before. Because of this all sorts of SEO optimization crap is done like writing BS articles nobody cares about.
          5. AI slop.
          6. Search engines have gotten better of getting rid of “illegal stuff”.
          7. A lot of sites are just presentational bloat with no substance. Very cool looking landing pages with all sorts of cool animations but when you need to actually find the information that you need… the same UI usually gets in the way.

          Oh and now we’re getting into age verification crap also yay

        • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I asked gpt5 and it told me to check the clutch safety switch. The thing you fixed.

          • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            5-10 years ago, you could be pretty sure this was a thing that actually needed checked, since the post about the clutch safety switch was posted by a real person who presumably had the same problem as you and fixed it with this method.

            Now, there’s no way to know if that’s actually the case, or if “clutch safety switch” is just a likely string of words to feed someone who is having car trouble. You might get lucky, or you might get sent on eight consecutive goose chases because an LLM fundamentally doesn’t know what factual knowledge is, it only knows how to reorder and regurgitate things that other people have said in other contexts.

          • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Isn’t that hyperbole rather than truth? They’re still carbon negative.

            They don’t provide AI by default (at least, I don’t get it). So people like us can continue to not use AI and the hundreds of million who use it every day can still support tree planting.

            I don’t like AI, but if they don’t add it they could risk limiting their reach and environmental goals.

            • squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Go to https://ecosia.org in a private browser window. It says “AI that answers to the planet”. Search something and the AI Overview on top is enabled by default.

              I use them with AI disabled, but it should be the default setting.

              Edit: I just did a couple test searches and didn’t get the AI overview. Don’t know what triggers it.

              • unglueclass23@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                33 minutes ago

                Go to https://ecosia.org/ in a private browser window. It says “AI that answers to the planet”. Search something and the AI Overview on top is enabled by default.

                For what it’s worth i’ve been using them for like a year and I clear my cookies often and never got this AI overview thingy you’re talking about. I actually have no clue how it even looks like.

              • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                It’s not me downvoting you, by the way. Anyway, AI is the antithesis of eco-friendly so I share the criticism. But given their success to date I defer to their sense for pragmatism and results.