• FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Isn’t that hyperbole rather than truth? They’re still carbon negative.

        They don’t provide AI by default (at least, I don’t get it). So people like us can continue to not use AI and the hundreds of million who use it every day can still support tree planting.

        I don’t like AI, but if they don’t add it they could risk limiting their reach and environmental goals.

        • squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Go to https://ecosia.org in a private browser window. It says “AI that answers to the planet”. Search something and the AI Overview on top is enabled by default.

          I use them with AI disabled, but it should be the default setting.

          Edit: I just did a couple test searches and didn’t get the AI overview. Don’t know what triggers it.

          • unglueclass23@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            Go to https://ecosia.org/ in a private browser window. It says “AI that answers to the planet”. Search something and the AI Overview on top is enabled by default.

            For what it’s worth i’ve been using them for like a year and I clear my cookies often and never got this AI overview thingy you’re talking about. I actually have no clue how it even looks like.

          • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It’s not me downvoting you, by the way. Anyway, AI is the antithesis of eco-friendly so I share the criticism. But given their success to date I defer to their sense for pragmatism and results.