Riot Games‘ kernel-level anti-cheat, Vanguard, has received an update that is allegedly altering system firmware to remove the ability of the user to access certain hardware associated with cheating.

Riot Games quoted one post discussing the anti-cheat, replying “congrats to the owners of a brand new $6k paperweight.” But how exactly does Vanguard’s new system make “paperweights” out of hardware?

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I hate cheaters. I think they should be banned from every single multiplayer game, or restricted to a pool of only other cheaters. With that said, no one has the right to disable your hardware remotely, especially over a piece of entertainment software. Use Linux, refuse kernel-level malware…

  • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    CLICKBAIT Why does the article name itself that when it shows a tweet from valorant of them clarifying that they are NOT bricking your PCs???

    I don’t like kernel level anti cheats, but I’m happy the people who decided to run Valorant with DMA cheats now have an expensive paperweight (the cheat device, not their pc).

    They even say you can still use the cheat hardware on other games if you disable IOMMU on your motherboard, but you cant on valorant.

    Slightly confusing wording, but I believe they arent bricking any hardware, just stopping it from working for cheating on their game.

  • Flasheroni@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Riot already clarified it’s not bricking hardware. They just posted a picture of dedicated cheat/DMA hardware, that’s useless now, because it cannot be used for Valorant.

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    22 hours ago

    While I am in favor of removal of cheaters from pretty much every online space, I’m not in favor of any company having that kind of power. Only I should be able to brick my devices.

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah your game is so important that you get to destroy people’s hardware? Shit should be illegal.

    • akwd169@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Read the article, it doesnt brick anything, the 6k paperweight comment is “reffering to valorant cheating devices that no longer work” whatever tf that means

      Once again the news is spreading a clickbaity headline and everyone reads just that then sprints to the comments

      • ozoned@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m against any kind of kernel level anticheat FOR A GAME.

        These kinds of things aren’t there to make then better for you. It’s there to protect investor’s money.

        They shouldn’t have access to you’re system and I’d imagine vast majority of people don’t have a clue what this means.

        • akwd169@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I didnt say anything about any of that, I said you didnt read the article, you just reacted to a false headline

          You got ragebaited

          • ozoned@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Oh and I just realized. I meant kernel level anticheat should be illegal. I didn’t make myself clear. I apologize. I run Linux though, so doesn’t affect me. :-D

    • Korkki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 day ago

      A kernel level anticheat is basically spyware in all but name and stated benign purpose. This if true is getting on the malware territory. Like who is responsible on the case of false positives.

    • mohab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      This was debunked, I think. It apparently doesn’t permanently brick anything, and mainly targets extra hardware bought primarily for cheating.

      Fuck Riot though. Glad 2XKO is not doing too hot.

  • alakey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    1 day ago

    Shouldn’t that be insanely illegal? This is literally malware. Even if someone is outright hacking into your servers, you can’t just hack back and ruin their system. There’s a reason the legal side is not supposed to resort to illegal actions, the fuck.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      While I agree with you this should be illegal, on the other side they have my sympathy. Also I think cheating in online games ruining others fun and the company should be illegal too. I mean why is that not illegal still is beyond me. It’s not even illegal for companies developing and selling this shit. But to comeback to your point about the illegality to brick hardware through a videogame, I agree with you.

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I dunno’, that’s kinda exactly what “scammer payback” does. Though that’s slightly different than them ‘just’ hacking you.

      Still agreed that doing it over a video game is just crazy.

  • demonsword@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    This should spook the hell of anyone still playing anything that relies on that. Imagine have that kind of malware running in your system, with kernel-level priviledges, that could simply fuck up your hardware if it thinks you might be cheating.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I would rather have cheaters in my games personally x)

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reckless behavior. Don’t trust a game company to exercise this extreme level of control over a device that you are supposed to own.

    Just say no to kernel anti-cheat.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s definitely too heavy handed. It’s not uncommon for anti cheat to flag someone erroneously, and to just hand an executioner the ability to nuke your computer without any form of redress is asinine and anti consumer, if not criminal.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yup, these systems have a history of false positives and flagging legitimate programs as cheating software and messing with a users system, using cheat software or not, to this extent is just absolutely wrong.

      It’s a big reason for me why I stopped buying and playing these types of games.

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    They sound quite smug now, let’s see when it inevitably triggers on someone’s legitimate hardware.