• Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I have always seen NATO as an alliance to get the US out of the mess they caused

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Please don’t ask what the guy who was in charge of Unit 731 (and his second in command) did after WW2 or why the Washington Airspace Museum is full of german names.

    And for the love of Ruthkanda, don’t look up Operation Gladio.

    • innerwar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      What the fuck did I just read? Specifically targeting left leaning groups? What possible reason would an org like nato need that for?!

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        14 hours ago

        NATO was formed as an antirevolutionary inter-imperialist coalition military. The entire purpose of NATO is to protect imperialist countries and kill off any leftists that stand to get in the way of western plunder.

  • originaltnavn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I take it you don’t share a border with Russia or the USSR before that? We are not fond of imperialists here either, and our government has certainly contributed to some unjust wars over the years, but we have little choice seeing how the kremlin waged wars against its neighbors and own people. I hope for the day when we can live in peace and quiet together with our Russian neighbors, the vast majority of them seem like nice people, but as long as the current regimes over there persist we need some sort of oversized defense alliance.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      NATO is the inter-imperialist alliance. Imperialism isn’t war, it’s a stage in capitalism and it results in vast plundering of resources and exploitation of labor in the periphery for the benefit of the imperial core. War is used as one option to maintain imperialism, as are sanctions and the buildup of dependence (such as exporting machinery that requires specific spare parts that only the imperialist country can produce).

      The USSR was anti-imperialist, which is why so much of the west was hostile towards it. The USSR was aiding liberation movements around the world, which dramatically hurt the profits of the western ruling classes.

      • originaltnavn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I unfortunately know a bit too many eastern europeans who experienced this aid to see the kremlin with rose tinted glasses. Of course “a random person on the internet said NATO is good actually” won’t change anyones mind, but I would generally recommend everyone to broaden which media they read. It is possible for several things to be true at the same time, for example both that the endless wars in the middle east and Africa are imperialist, and that there is a valid need for military defense against Russia, even if it is flawed.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Russia has absolutely no interest in invading Europe. This is a narrative used to justify increasing European military budgets as the spoils of imperialism are drying up and the global south is gaining more independence from the US and Europe. NATO is a blight on human progress and needs to be dissolved for a better future.

          • originaltnavn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            9 hours ago

            So is Ukraine not in Europe or not being invaded? How about Georgia and Moldova? I guess the constant threats against Svalbard and Baltikum, as well as the funding and bribery of alt-right groups all over the west can be seen as technically not an invasion, but it does paint a scary picture. It might be true that Putin don’t want to invade western and northern Europe, but he is actively trying to reconquer what he sees as lost western colonies.

            • BanMeFromPosting [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 hours ago

              The “invasion” began in 2014 when the US orchestrated a hostile takeover of the Ukrainian government. It was then continued with several years of the nazis in Ukraine bombing the Donbass, breaching two peace treaties. Russia then responded to that agression, which one can think a lot of things about. The “invasion” was the US-coup-government of Ukraine invading the Donbass.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              The crisis in Ukraine was sparked by aggressive NATO expansion, a western-backed Banderite coup in 2014, and the inability of Russia to resolve the ensuing civil war and ethnic cleansing committed by the new Kiev regime against the Donbass with the Minsk agreements. Russia wanted to join NATO decades ago and join the imperialist club, but the west decided it would rather re-colonize Russia, hence the reciprocation from Russia.

  • ReCursing@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    Any thing to back that up because that sounds like bullshit spread by the fascist US government who want NATO gone on behalf of Russia