• rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I know you’re just being cheeky, but union busting like this is extremely uncommon. Under current NLRB rules, it would quickly be ruled a ULP and would cause their union to be immediately recognized

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yes. It will move slower because of funding and staffing cuts, but it will still pretty quick given the situation. Joy Silk was resurrected in a ruling in 2023, and has been the guiding principle of union elections since then

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          The majority of his presidency he’s kept them with too few members to have a quorum and therefore unable to do much of anything.

          Last I’d heard, Trump was officially allowed to dismiss members of the NLRB at will. His administration is basically the definition of corruption and regulatory capture.

          Don’t get me wrong - I’d be happy to see things go well for unions but I have zero faith in anything good happening. Shit is so fucked I’m legitimately worried about any legal challenges to anything because we might get another Roe v. Wade.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 minutes ago

            While that is a valid concern, most rulings don’t require a quorum. Most rulings are handled at the regional level. I’m intimately familiar with this situation, I have an ongoing ULP for discrimination