• raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    For example the issue of MySQL 5 being unavailable would be a non-issue with a container

    So people careless enough to “just container it” for old, possibly security-compromised software - you call that a “non-issue”? How about upgrading and configuring for compatibility?

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re the ones running a 10 years old database on a 11 years old os in a public facing server “because it just works”, not me

      If it was a container, they could just tag a new version when the database went EOL 5 years ago, without being locked on what the package manager was offering

      Because they used MySQL 5 on CentOS 7 from the package manager and couldn’t easily upgrade

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re the ones running a 10 years old database on a 11 years old os in a public facing server “because it just works”, not me

        My point was that they upgraded to a newer database (also old, but newer), which is arguably better than containerization.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        With this small of a deployment you’re just moving your issue to the containerisation layer. Unless you use some saas kubernetes or other managed solution.