• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I can’t tolerate surveillance software on my PC that I use to develop surveillance software!

    • Facebook employees
  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Install an autoclicker/autotyper HID USB key that, when it senses and idle computer, spams clicks and keystrokes at plausible spoeds, but which outputs pseudorandom nonsense, to muddy the data pool and produce far more incoherent data than coherent data

    • SpeakerToLampposts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’d be tempted to modify my user environment as much as possible, so the ways I use it wouldn’t be transferrable to anyone else’s environment. I’ve already done this to some extent, with e.g. nonstandard command line aliases and highly-customized wrapper scripts around the tools I use a lot.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If I wanted to reduce the workforce, but didn’t want to pay for redundancies, I’d implement some nasty, overbearing policies that would make anyone with morals, a sense of decency, or integrity, resign.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I see, so the Meta employees have the typical conservative mindset: any misdeed is perfectly fine as long as it doesn’t affect you personally.

    That’s what I thought - it’s probably not just the employees of social media companies who feel this way, but also those at Palantir and similar. Not to mention the “defense” contractors and the like.

    I really wonder how these people can still look at themselves in the mirror.

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I knew a guy who went to work for palantir a bunch of years ago. Was always friendly at work. I asked him “but what’re you going to do if they do bad stuff, like spying on people?”

      He just shrugged. Didn’t care. The money was good.

      I don’t know if this alone is proof that’s a bad person, but I think it precludes him from being a good one.

      • Archr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I would argue no. Partly because I am in a similar situation. But also because I would be a fool to quit such a stable, laid back job in a market where it is extremely difficult to find a job in my field.

        Granted I also do care. But not enough to risk poverty.

        • jtrek@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s hard to make a full judgment without knowing more details but “the pay is good and it’s easy” isn’t really a compelling justification for “and I help evil manifest in the world”.

            • foxwolf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              But are you doing any of that to your big evil company? Or is it easier to be a good worker and not risk getting fired?

              • davidgro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                You’re asking someone who may literally work at a surveillance company to publicly admit to the stuff they linked? Personally I think it was a bad idea for them to post that link or even suggest they know it exists.

                • Archr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  And that’s why I don’t connect my personal devices to the corporate network, because I know what we can see.

  • yumyumsmuncher@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Employees working for evil company: “Hey evil company don’t do evil stuff to us”

    Evil company does evil thing to them

    Employees: =O

  • rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    23 hours ago

    ah so it’s fine when you develop software and tools to spy on your userbase and hell people who aren’t even in your userbase but when it comes to the higher ups at meta using YOUR data to train YOUR AI that’s too far huh?

  • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    23 hours ago

    obviously a layoff tactic. Their AI group shit the bed after they burned millions on third life the zuckerverse

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      obviously a layoff tactic.

      It sure smells like it, right? But, and I’m repeating myself and others, the important part here is that, if it is a layoff tactic, it’s a horrible one: as per the Dead Sea Effect, the people who leave as a result of declining workplace environment are those most able to leave, i.e the most employable staff, with each round of departures. Thus, the people whom Meta would want to stay around are the people most likely to find, get, and depart for jobs elsewhere. And while Meta are bastards, the mechanics of working in a massive org like that one score really well for skills companies want.

      I wish them luck in this terrible job market, and hope they can find a supportive environment again. We can always do with more smart people working for the greater good instead of against it.