• MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yup. But, that dollar changes hands far more times in the society with higher costs. That’s a good thing, assuming costs don’t dwarf income

      • hayvan@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Each time money moves: one trade happened. Someone bought, someone sold something. It’s all activity. Money moving around fast: a lot of activity, people getting what they want. Money sitting still: stagnation, no work done, no production etc.

        That’s the theory. Of course reality is a bit more complicated. People doing volunteer work is often net positive for humanity but won’t show up in economic metrics.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          There’s also the fact that a lot of those dollars moving are against people’s will or for stupid, inefficient reasons.

          If we each paid each other a thousand bucks an hour not to hit each other then that grows GDP without doing anything useful.

        • SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Ok, but why should people get what they want?

          I’m in Vietnam at the moment, lots of people work simple manual jobs and just get by. They don’t have a lot, but they’re friendly, welcoming, and generally happy.

          Meanwhile, the weekend before last I was in Singapore where loads of money is constantly moving around … and it did not feel like a good place to be.

          • hayvan@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I’m not disagreeing with you. I have held the belief that neoclassic theory of economics is bullshit since I studied it 20 years ago. I’m just explaining that bullshit which is still used to measure things like development, progress etc.