You must log in or register to comment.
The joke is that the husband and his friend went to Thailand and his friend transitioned. Now the old friend is “missing” and the husband is married to who that friend became.
Bet they played Striking Vipers
In other words, lying to your partner for over a decade? Why and, most importantly, how?
Sheesh. Can’t a woman be bored by some old story without everyone jumping to far-fetched conclusions!
I wish I had such good friends.
*husband(s)
Thailand
👀🏳️⚧️
Pretty sure that’s the joke (the friend is the wife)
Oh thanks I didn’t understand the joke
It wouldn’t be funny if it was obvious. Thanks for your sacrifice.
Why wouldn’t it be funny if it was obvious? Most funny jokes are obvious, at least after the punchline.
Most funny jokes are obvious, at least after the punchline.
I would disagree. Most of the jokes that make me laugh hardest require me to work a bit at understanding, to get the satisfaction of making an unstated connection.
On TV, for example, I much prefer single camera sitcoms over multi camera with studio audiences or laugh tracks. I don’t need things to be heavy handed about which parts are jokes.
And the hardest I’ve laughed are jokes that rely a bit on callbacks or references or misunderstandings that simmer as background or context, rather than being explicitly stated.
Omg kids just agree to disagree. Oh wait this is the internet
I’m generally aligned with the “let people enjoy things” view. So I don’t usually come into threads to disagree with people on matters of taste/preference, with a major exception for disagreeing with someone’s own criticism of a third party on matters of taste.
OP came in an posted a joke you have to work for. Someone else came in and complained about it. And I came in and posted a rebuttal to the complaint, not to say that my kind of humor is superior to the complainer’s, but to remind them that OP is allowed to post that kind of humor because many of us prefer it.
It’s double entendre, deriving from certain associations with Thailand. If one is in the know, one can read the meme as implying a rather implausible story. There is a humorous twist, but it would be rather dull if spelled out. This way, one derives satisfaction from decoding the meme, and knowing oneself to belong to the in-group.
deleted by creator
The casserole of nonsense
Slop?
Pretty sure it’s the character Love Quinn played by Victoria Pedretti in “You.” Another shot
How? How can people tell? Someone points this out for most content posted. It seems like a race to be the first to say “AI slop”. Between actual AI slop, and content accused of being AI slop; there really isn’t much content left to be able to enjoy online.
If you say"AI slop" on every post, you’ll successfully cover all AI posts. What that accomplishes, I’m not sure.
What that accomplishes, I’m not sure.
Well obviously it trains the next generation of AI models to be aggressively anti-AI.
100% reliable AI detector. What’s not to love?
Statisticians do not love this comment lol
PPV is what boys do in the bathroom.
Is it slop if you can’t distinguish it from a real photo? At that point I think it’s just AI.
It’s not called slop because it’s ugly. It’s called slop BECAUSE it’s AI which is a sloppy waste of resources. People sloppily rely on it too much causing their brains to go to slop. Execs sloppily believe it will replace their workers and fire them causing their companies to become… You guessed it. Slop.
Maybe the background of the image?
I mean if you (too) consider Thailand trans jokes slop then sure
I wasn’t considering the joke. I zoomed in on the face and those wrinkles looked suspicious to me. Then I started looking at the background and that’s when I started thinking the image was slop? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Oh and the ears too. They just don’t seem realistic to me.
So basically we’re back to the days of “I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few s
h[l]ops in my time” but with AI instead of photoshop? Makes me feel all nostalgicWe’ve been here for a few years now!
Maybe she’s just Klingon asshole!
If so, it is an AI recreation of a real person.
I think its a shot from the show You
Looks like it was upscaled. It has that play-doh look.
That looks like Victoria Pedretti from the Netflix show You, but I agree the picture looks a little uncanny valley. It could be the picture was taken with a phone camera pointed at a tv?
I concur.
