• Chippys_mittens@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Literally kills me. “What you’ve got video games and jerking off to do? We really need you to cover this overtime”. Verbatim from my chief awhile back. It’s not like he’s wrong… but come on man. I pick up a good bit of OT as it is before being personally asked.

      • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I’ve been in Management for the last few years, some teams were 60+ people and some were only about 15. Your chief is a dick that needs to get their hands dirty. Any boss that isn’t willing to respect the time of their team, whether on the clock or off the clock, doesn’t deserve to be a boss.

        I knew the hours of everyone on my team. I never gave a shit if you had kids or a party waiting for you after work, what you do after your scheduled hours is up to you. If I didn’t have enough employees for the work we had, that’s my problem and not yours.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Eh. When your boss has four people in the office to do six people’s jobs, and the VP just said they’re cutting headcount by two.

      • Zwiebel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I haven’t been in that situation, but I don’t understand why you wouldn’t just continue working your normal hours. If they give you more tasks, well I guess it’ll take longer. It’s not like you’re missing out on a promotion since they clearly don’t value you anyways

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I don’t understand why you wouldn’t just continue working your normal hours.

          Some of it comes down to real social pressure. People work harder when they’ve literally got the boss at their desk saying “We need to hit Deadline X or Consequences Y will happen”. For people past their breaking point, I tend to see them work less. If you’re already on the job hunt (or if you’ve landed a job or queued for retirement or whatever), enthusiasm for doing your current job plummets. If you think you’re about to get fired, same.

          But for folks who genuinely believe they’ve got a future at the firm - at least for another year or three - it often boils down to “Do I want to be stressed forever, or just get over this hump and survive until things die down?” Hitting the deadline and getting the project over the line typically comes with a refractory period of sorts. A slowdown in work hours and a more relaxed pace. Missing the deadline means even more work and even more stress and even more of my boss at my desk (or my boss’s boss or my boss’s boss’s boss) staring at my computer and asking why the thing isn’t done yet.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Missing the deadline undermines your position in the firm and marks you out as unreliable for the better projects and promotions.

              • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Well, given your own description of the scenario

                When your boss has four people in the office to do six people’s jobs, and the VP just said they’re cutting headcount by two.

                I would not count on ever getting a promotion or better project anyway.